Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Friday, December 29, 2023

Hope in 2024

Looking for some optimism for 2024? Simon Rosenberg has some.


Biden’s 2024 chances are much stronger than people realize

Two things have happened to Trump since 2020 that are going to make it very hard for him to win in 2024

By 

As we head into 2024, the conventional wisdom is that Democrats are on the back foot for next year’s elections. But there are three reasons I am optimistic that 2024 is going to be a good year for Democrats:

First, President Joe Biden has kept his central promise in the 2020 election: that he would lead the nation to the other side of Covid, successfully. The pandemic has receded. Our economic recovery has been better than any other G7 nation. GDP grew at an annual rate of 4.9% last quarter, and more than 3% for the Biden presidency. We have the best job market since the 1960s and the lowest uninsured rate in U.S. history. The Dow Jones broke 37,000 this month for the first time. Wage growth, new business formation and prime-age labor participation rates are all at historically elevated levels. Prices fell — yes, fell — last month. Rents are softening, and gas prices and crime rates are fallingDomestic oil and renewable production are at record levels. The annual deficit, which exploded under Trump, is trillions less today. 

Consumer sentiment has risen sharply in recent weeks, and measures of life, job and income satisfaction are remarkably high. There is no doubt that recent years have been hard — Covid, an insurrection at the Capitol, the Russian invasion of Ukraine, repeated OPEC price hikes, global and domestic inflation — but it is increasingly clear that America is getting to the other side of this challenging period, and are in a far better place than when President Biden took office. 

Second, the strength of the president’s record is only matched by the strength of his party. I don’t think it is widely understood how strong the Democratic Party is right now. The party has won more votes in seven of the past eight presidential elections, something no party has done in modern American history. Over the last four presidential elections, Democrats have averaged 51% of the popular vote, their best showing over four national elections since the 1930s.

In both 2022 and 2023, Democrats prevented the historical down ballot struggle of the party in power and had two remarkably successful elections. In the 2022 midterms, Democrats’ statewide margins were greater than the 2020 presidential margins in Arizona, Colorado, Georgia, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire and Pennsylvania — all recent battleground states. That showing led the party to pick up a Senate seat, four state legislative chambers and two governorships, and helped keep the House of Representatives close, making it far more likely Republicans lose it in 2024. 

This year, Democrats flipped a Supreme Court seat in Wisconsindefeated a six-week abortion ban in Ohiokept the Virginia state house, debunking the idea that Republicans could hide behind a 15-week abortion ban; and took state legislative seats, municipalities and school board seats across the country. Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, a Democrat, grew his margin of victory from 2019, and Republicans lost mayoral elections in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Jacksonville, Florida, two of the largest GOP-controlled cities in the country. And in over three dozen state legislative special elections around the country, Democrats outperformed 2020 – an election we won by 4.5 percentage points — by an average of 5 percentage points. 

While in 2022, Republicans could point to gains in New York and California to offset their losses in the battleground states, there were no places in 2023 where they outperformed expectations. A blue wave washed across the U.S. in 2023, and this ongoing strong performance of the Democratic Party in election after election, in all parts of the country, should fill Biden’s supporters with confidence.

Finally, while Democrats keep winning, conventional wisdom continues to overly discount Trump’s historic baggage and MAGA’s repeated electoral failures. Despite these repeated failures, Republicans are on the cusp of nominating Trump again, who this time is an even more degraded and dangerous version of MAGA than he was in 2020.

Two things have happened to Trump since 2020 that are going to make it very hard for him to win in 2024 — the stripping away of women’s reproductive rights, and his attempt to overturn the 2020 election and end American democracy for all time. Additionally, this year courts have already determined that he sexually abusedjournalist E. Jean Carroll in a department store; oversaw a yearslong financial fraud; and led a party-wide effort, involving hundreds of Republican leaders and thousands of willing allies, to overturn the last election, culminating in a violent attack on Congress. 

Democrats will be able to argue that no one is more responsible for overturning Roe v. Wade than Trump; that his mishandling of classified documents is to blame for the most serious security breach in American history; that in concert with Russian President Vladimir Putin he will end the global liberal order that has brought America and the world unprecedented prosperity and peace; that he supports more dead kids in schools, a faster warming planet, lost health insurance for tens of millions of Americans and the end of American democracy for all time. Trump represents an unprecedented threat to the country, is even more extreme than 2020, and has, in political parlance, the highest “negatives” of any candidate perhaps in our history. It is going to be very hard for him to win next year. 

For all these reasons, as we head into 2024, I am optimistic that Joe Biden and the Democrats will once again beat Donald Trump, and hopefully, this time, send MAGA into the dustbin of history where it belongs.

Original.


Sunday, December 24, 2023

You're a Nazi

...if you still support Trump.

If You Support Donald Trump, You're a Nazi
by The Rude Pundit
12/23/23

I said what I said.

I've been thinking, as former president and current inevitable doom of the republic Donald Trump proudly goes full Hitler in his speeches and social media pronouncements: do MAGA redcaps pause between filling their kids' Never Surrender Christmas stocking with Trump candy bullion and wiping their dicks with a Mar-a-Lago towel after jacking off to their iPhone videos of when they went into the Capitol on January 6 (and still haven't been arrested yet, motherfuckers) and think, "Am I a Nazi? And if I am, am I okay with that?" 

I mean, sure, sure, I know that this straw MAGA moron doesn't believe what the wackos in the fake, failing lamestream media are saying about Trump. But the orange goon himself is giving credence to the Hitler comparisons by insisting that "I never read Mein Kampf" and saying to lipless fuck weasel Hugh Hewitt, "I know nothing about Hitler. I’m not a student of Hitler. I never read his works." (You just know that behind all that is that Trump doesn't want anyone to get credit for the shit he says. I'm sure he's told one of his lickspittles, "Hitler wasn't as smart as me" or some such fuckery.)

To be a loyal redcap stormtrooper, you gotta go along with Trump no matter which way his insistent madness drives his rhetoric. And, truly, you don't disagree with him when says, "They’re coming from all over the world. People all over the world, we have no idea. They could be healthy. They could be very unhealthy. They could bring in disease that’s going to catch on in our country, but they do bring in crime, but they have them coming from all over the world and they're destroying the blood of our country." But what you're agreeing with is Nazi shit. It's flat out Nazi shit. Trump can say, as he told Hewitt, that it's not the same as what Hitler said, but it is the same as what Hitler said, except Hitler was talking about Jews and Trump's talking about undocumented migrants. And Trump wants to round them up and put them in camps before deporting them by the millions. And he wants laws passed that would allow authorities to check the papers of anyone they "suspect" of not being American. It's absolute insanity that would fundamentally alter the fabric of the country. It will cause upheaval and violence and economic ruin. But Nazis don't give a shit about that kind of thing because purity matters above all. The rest will take care of itself once the blood is purified. Or, you know, un-poisoned. 

I'm gonna bet that your average redcap doesn't give a shit if they're called "Nazis." Indeed, many of them are likely to embrace it because they think it drives the liberals crazy. They'll post memes of that screaming bespectacled woman as a snarky reaction to how the left thinks mass execution of undocumented migrants at the Trump concentration camps is wrong and tweet out to the Nazis on Elon's Internet Bullshit Factory that we should be rounding up liberals and hanging them. Oh, wait. They already do that last part.

Sure, sure, some Trump supporters, desperately hoping to rationalize away the stink of Nazi, will try to say that they know the "rhetoric" Trump uses is over the top and even problematic, but they just think what he did for the country was so awesome that they have to support him and, hey, he can't do all those bad things. You know what you call someone who tries to justify what a Nazi says? You call them a "Nazi." (You also call them "fucking brain damaged" if they don't remember how Trump gave this nation a bloody ass fisting during Covid.)

That's where we are right now in the United States as we watch the MAGA redcaps goosestep closer and closer to mass violence. Trump promises to abuse the criminal justice system: "What I’m going to do is give indemnifications to any police officer that gets in trouble for pursuing a criminal because that’s what we have to do." And to have mass purges of perceived enemies: "We will demolish the deep state. We will expel the warmongers. We will drive out the globalists. We will cast out the communists, Marxists and fascists. We will throw off the sick political class that hates our country. We will rout the fake news media." And he declares that America under Biden is a nightmare: "We are a failing nation. We are a nation that has lost its confidence, its willpower and its strength. We are a nation that has lost its way, but we are not going to allow this horror to continue." Man, Nazis know how to use propaganda to keep the rubes all pissed off and ready for action.

So, yeah, I'll call these sick motherfuckers "Nazis." If you're gonna follow someone whose language lines up with Hitler, who has praised dictators and who wants to bring their methods to the United States, who promises to round up millions of people just trying to live their lives, who threatens to attack our neighbors and break our alliances, who sees non-white people as invaders or criminals who must be dealt with harshly, who wants to "cleanse" the country of people who don't believe the same shit he does, fuck, yeah, you're a Nazi. I don't wanna wait around until gas chambers are built to finally sound an alarm. 

And that's how the 2024 campaign should go. You can be with the Nazis or you can be with the people who think Nazis deserved to have their asses kicked into the garbage heap. Indeed, history teaches us that we are obligated to kick Nazi asses. If only there was a short, punchy word we could use for anti-facist...

Original.


Wednesday, December 6, 2023

Dan Rather

We live in strange times. The GOP has sold their soul to Donald Trump, perhaps the most menacing public figure in decades. They are scared of Trump and Trump's rabid supporters, who make all types of threats against people who dare oppose Trump. 

Very few elected Republicans had the temerity and spine to oppose Trump, and for that they were drummed out of the party. But you know as well as I know that not every regular Republican out there thinks that Trump is the second messiah. Many think he is demented and a threat to democracy, but they lurk undetected in the shadows. Come election time, I trust them to do the right thing, and if Donald Trump is on the ballot, to vote for Democrats. The nation depends on it. I find it hard to believe that the GOP is willing to toss 230+ years of democracy for this orange illiterate piece of shit.


Can These Two Women Help Save America?

by Dan Rather and Elliot Kirschner
Dec 6, 2023

If you’ve been near a TV news program or newspaper in recent days, you might know that former Republican Congresswoman Liz Cheney is on a book tour. 


If you’ve been anywhere on Earth this year, you probably know that music superstar Taylor Swift is on a concert tour. 


And if you have even the most rudimentary awareness of politics, you probably know that Joe Biden is president of the United States and running for reelection. 


What do these three have in common, other than that they sound like the setup to a joke (Cheney, Swift, and Biden walk into a bar…)? Maybe the rescue of American democracy. 


It is surely a sign that we are in very strange and dangerous times that anyone would write a column putting these three people together. But here we are. And that’s because another person, whom we will leave unnamed, looms ominously over the future of our country.


Recently, coverage has increased (including here at Steady) about how America’s most famous criminal defendant and only twice-impeached former president is running for office again on an explicit promise to destroy our constitutional system of government and the rule of law. And one of the people raising that alarm is Cheney. 


The daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney, and until recently, an exemplar of extreme conservative politics in the United States, Liz Cheney famously became a pariah in her party because she called the former president the dangerous disgrace that he is. 


Her service on the House committee that investigated the violent insurrection of January 6 cemented her role as enemy to many Republicans. It also earned her appreciation and even plaudits from Democrats who had previously clashed with her on almost every imaginable policy issue. On Monday evening, MSNBC host Rachel Maddow introduced a cordial interview with Cheney by explaining how absurd it would have seemed at one point for the two of them to sit down and agree on anything.


But that is what a threat to destroy America will do. 


And this brings us to Taylor Swift, who was just named Time magazine’s Person of the Year. Her Eras Tour is estimated to have brought in over $850 million and boosted the U.S. economy by $5 billion, according to Forbes magazine. Swift’s legions of fans, called  Swifties, are drawn not only to her music but to her message of female empowerment. They respect Swift as someone who has stood up for herself in what can be a brutal and demeaning business. She is an entrepreneur and an innovator. And increasingly, she has emerged as someone eager to lend her voice to political causes. 


She endorsed Democrats for election in Tennessee in 2018 and Biden for president in 2020. A single recent Instagram post encouraging her fans to register to vote drove 35,000 new registrations. She is a strong advocate for LGBTQ+ rights. 


Swift’s new boyfriend, NFL superstar Travis Kelce, is also no stranger to political issues. He famously took a knee during the “The Star-Spangled Banner” in solidarity with Black players protesting police violence. And he has been a strong supporter of the COVID vaccine, to the outrage of anti-vaxxers. He also endorsed Bud Light beer after the brand was boycotted by conservatives because it had featured a transgender internet celebrity in one of its ads. 


What might it look like if both Swift and Cheney lend their names and energy to Biden’s reelection campaign? Obviously, the two cases would be very different. But they could add up to a big difference. That is, if Cheney stops flirting with the idea of her own presidential run —  a prospect she has teased in some interviews. Such a bid would increase the chances of a former president’s return to power. And it’s difficult to imagine her making that choice. 


Cheney speaks to disaffected Republicans and moderates who might not like Biden or his policies but legitimately fear a second term for his likely opponent. That Cheney is working to elect Democrats says a lot. It says that there will be a time for us to debate policies again, but now is not that time. Because if we lose American democracy, nothing else will matter. It’s a powerful argument that could sway some voters on the margins or encourage those who might have stayed home to come out and vote. That could be enough to swing elections in battleground states. 


As for Swift, the effects could be even greater. She is extremely popular with young voters (although she has millions of older fans, as well). Standing alongside Biden could help assuage fears about his age. She could highlight the right’s potential harm on race, gender, abortion, LGBTQ+ rights, and more. She could also entice new voters to register and encourage them to show up on Election Day. Swift’s fanbase is so large that it encompasses many who are conservative and Republican. Might she even change some minds?


We have already seen the modus operandi of the former president when he is criticized. His instinct is to lash out and insult, demean and degrade. How will that play with the Swifties? It would certainly reaffirm Liz Cheney’s point: that he is supremely unfit, morally and emotionally, to be president.


Taylor Swift, Liz Cheney, and Joe Biden campaign for the presidency. That’s not the start of a joke. Could it be an unlikely alliance to save the United States of America?


Original.


Monday, December 4, 2023

Buttmunch Musk

This article in the Defector, by Albert Burneko, is full of good ridicule of Nazi-wannabe Elon Musk. Enjoy! And thanks, DF, for finding it.


Looking Good, Elon! Feeling Good, Trashcan Man!

11:44 AM EST on December 1, 2023

By Albert Burneko


These are heady times for Elon Musk, the most exhausting clod on Earth. On Thursday, Tesla, the electric vehicle company he controls, was due to begin deliveries of its long-awaited, -delayed, and -derided Cybertruck, an all-electric light-duty pickup swaddled in angular stainless steel and heretofore famous mostly for amateur videos of its struggles to mount normal curbs and modest hummocks (and for being spectacularly bad-looking). Finally, after a four-year wait, some unknown number of Tesla superfans will get to own what is perhaps, given all the various factors bearing on the production and purchase of personal vehicles in the year 2023, the single most embarrassing creation in the history of humankind.


Musk's other companies are up to stuff, as well. A couple weeks ago SpaceX, his rockets-and-space outfit, exploded a skyscraper-sized would-be spaceship in the sky, far shy of its goals; the wreck rained trash across the planet, in what the cow-eyed legacy media called a landmark achievement despite various official space agencies around the world having long since accomplished "launching a ship into space without exploding it" by the time Elon Musk was born. The Boring Company, Musk's tunneling outfit, has been in the news, too, with Fortune's report that the company—famous for its grandiose Hyperloop proposals in various cities and municipalities—has accomplished a grand total of 2.4 miles of tunnel in seven years, precisely none of which are anything like the Hyperloop concept or in any way an improvement on aboveground commuting, for either commuters or towns. 


That's not all, though! X, née Twitter, the microblogging platform this genius bought on accident for twice its value a little over a year ago and which likely is now worth less than a quarter of what he paid for it, is struggling. It is losing its most valuable advertising partners, whose money has always provided nearly all the company's anemic bloodflow, entirely 100-percent because of stuff Musk has done to the company and its product, either via numb-skulled executive fiat or through the sneering bigotry he himself posts and promotes on the site. Again, this is entirely 100-percent because Musk is, and I do not say this lightly, the rankest ignoramus presently living.

 

As briefly as I can summarize: He destroyed Twitter's utility as a news service. He actively elevated and empowered its most poisonous and/or frightening and/or tiresome users. He made it janky and unreliable by gutting its workforce. He renamed it "X," instantly rendering it somehow both anonymous and incandescently corny. Worst and most poisonous of all, he associated it with himself—with, that is, the rankest ignoramus presently living. It's that guy's website, now.


As to that. People still evidently want to hear from this absolute buttmunch, which is not really surprising I guess, even where it can't be explained by ghoulish rubbernecking. Just about everything bad anyone might ever wish to say about society under capitalism is both crystallized and proven correct by the fact that Elon Musk remains Important despite all of the above. In fact he is probably at least as important as he has ever been, because "important" is just a synonym for "rich" in a society in which nothing substantial can be accomplished or even meaningfully attempted without first convincing at least one hyper-rich cretin that it will gratify them personally or financially. Conceivably Musk might not be quite as rich, or uh liquid or whatever, as he was some time ago, or maybe his rate of becoming richer has slowed somewhat, but he remains, inarguably, super duper friggin' rich, and therefore important at a scale previously reserved for, like, pharaohs. Andrew Ross Sorkin of the New York Times and CNBC interviewed him earlier this week, and it served as a nice reminder of why pharaohs so seldom sat for interviews.


Here is an entirely representative snippet... (sorry, could not post the link directly here)


This bit, in which Sorkin attempts to extract lucid thoughts from Musk on the harm his own actions have done to X/Twitter, is a hilarious document for a few reasons. The first is just Musk's whole personal deal, which is instantly familiar to anyone who has ever shared a dreary retail shift (or, hell, elevator ride) with a tiresome dickweed who does all of his day-to-day socializing in hyper-curated online spaces. There's the man's howling bottomless anti-charisma; the painful, excruciatingly misplaced cocksureness; the not merely bad but actively uncanny timing of someone unaccustomed to unmediated meatspace interaction. Has there ever been a less magnetic individual? I wouldn't follow him if he was ahead of me in line for free ice cream. 


Musk, for his part, seems to think he's crushing it. The man is so profoundly surethat his dumb, todder-like, obviously pre-planned "Go fuck yourself" is going to dazzle and delight the crowd; that they will, depending on their sympathies, gasp (the owned libs) or applaud (astounded freethinkers) at his boldness, or moral courage, or edgy fearless cool or whatever. He's so sure of it that he takes not one but two more passes at the line, each more deathly than the last: first with some theatrical handwaving that earns him a smattering of pity-chuckles from the crowd, and then again as a psychedelically cringey "G ... F ... Y" that makes clear he either doesn't understand or is intentionally dodging Sorkin's anodyne question.


Now, it's true: Corny self-impressed mediocrities with zero self-awareness are not, as a rule, especially hilarious, even unintentionally. But this is one of the planet's richest and most powerful people—a 52-year-old ultra-celebrity who can pick and choose his media engagements with a privilege rivaled only by certain heads of state and Taylor Swift—fully reduced to Walter Sobchak's "Shomer fucking Shabbos" routine by momentary exposure to gentle half-adversarial questioning along utterly predictable lines from a broadly friendly interlocutor. That's funny!


No less funny is Musk's virtually instantaneous full-brain meltdown, as soon as Sorkin shows the slightest resistance to the megaton rhetorical force of awkwardly repeating "Go fuck yourself" in increasingly dumb ways, at people who are not present, for the benefit of people who are not impressed. "Yes, no, no, it, I-I-I, if, a-a-a-a-absolutely, so, um, no-no, totally, so, so, wha, eh, actually," he offers, all but bleeding from the eyeballs: "What this advertiser boycott is gonna do is, it's gonna kill the company." What's remarkable is not the prediction (he might be right!) but the dunce's bearing as he makes it. He appears to think, to sincerely believe, that what he is proclaiming is something like an indictment ... of the advertisers who are not paying money to promote their shit on Twitter.


To back this up, Musk offers what he appears, once again in all sincerity, to believe is some kind of threat: "And the whole world will know that those advertisers killed the company. And we will document it in great detail."


Now comes my very favorite part. Sorkin, with growing incredulity—Elon has turned out to be a much cringier and more childish dullard than he'd hoped, to the point where sophisticated discussion is already fully off the table—replies that those advertisers will dispute the accusation that they killed the company. At which point a once again totally certain Musk cuts in with, "Oh yeah? Tell it ... tell it to Earth."


Tell it to Earth. Tell it to Earth! Tell it ... to Earth. To Earth, tell it! Tortilla teeth!


Musk holds here. Once again he is expecting to have impressed everyone. Once again he is greeted by icy polar silence.


The advertisers, Sorkin pushes back, will say that you killed the company by saying bad stuff that made it a toxic environment for a business that is just trying to sell iPads to be associated with. "And let's see," Musk replies, smirking triumphantly, "how Earth responds to that."


Truly, I say to you today that this man's brain is like a solitary Cheeto. His contention—again, one of the richest guys alive, the world-famous Mind Wizard and Business Lord the legacy media spent much of the past 15 years hailing as a modern Leonardo da Vinci who will usher humanity to the stars—is that X going out of business (because he turned it into Elon's Around-The-Clock Nazi Hoedown) will be worse for, say, Apple than it will be ... for X.


Is there any other way to read this? To the extent that this addled gobbledygook can be parsed for an underlying logic, that has to be it. After all, Musk is not offering any adjustments to his own behavior here; the onus for saving his company, he appears sincerely to believe, falls heavily and urgently on, like, Disney. Freaking Disney must act quickly to resume posting advertisements on X, lest X fail, leaving freaking Disney exposed to the judgment ... of Earth. The man has shot his own hand off with a blunderbuss; now, with absolute bulletproof self-assurance, he threatens freaking Disney: Reattach my hand for me—pay to reattach my hand!—or face the wrath ... of Earth.


Here is where I started thinking about the ridiculous anecdote from Walter Isaacson's Musk biography that tore its way around the internet a while back, the one where a younger Elon continually goes all-in on poker bets, losing and losing and losing, until, solely because he has enough money to absorb the losses and keep at this stupid-ass gambit, he lucks into a winner, at which point he gets up and walks triumphantly from the table. Here are the wages of lifelong insulation from accountability and material consequence: The poor doofus simply has no idea how to judge stakes, success and failure, causes and effects. On a basic level he does not even really possess the capacity to tell who is risking what in a conflict; he is the equivalent of a tennis player, down two sets and a double-break in the third, exulting because their opponent faulted on a first-serve attempt. They wanted an ace there and didn't get one, and that makes me the victor.


X is very important to Elon Musk. Probably not in business or financial terms: He long ago crested the levels of wealth concentration that render him effectively invulnerable to material consequence; in the time I've been writing this post he made more money just off the interest on the money he's already got than every generation of my family put together ever had or will have. But personally, to his ego, X is gigantic: It is where he encounters the legions of contemptible sweaty-handed losers who have paid money to call him history's greatest golden boy when he posts threadbare epic bacon shit from 20 years ago. Whatever it once was, it is now mostly a place where dead-eyed supplicants tell him that he is playing five-dimensional chess when he pukes down the front of his shirt. It is where his null personality and vaporware wit find mediation in the imaginative work those jerks will do on his behalf to superimpose charm and irony onto the bean-brained inheritance baby who sold them a blue Big Dumb Asshole badge online.


His problem—one of them, anyway—is that he can't tell where he ends and the world outside himself begins. X is very large and important to him and he cannot imagine living without it; therefore it must also be that way to, like, friggin' Microsoft. Because he has never experienced anything like real stakes in his life, because, like all members of his class, he handles consequences by simply pouring them onto the head of someone poorer, he genuinely cannot conceive of X's death harming him more than it harms someone else. He can't imagine that the earth, writ large—Earth, the planet with people living on it—might not pity him just as much as he pities himself.


Many different things can rot a person's mind—can erode their critical and moral faculties, dissolve their awareness of themselves and of the reality of others, turn them into Norma Desmond demanding her close-up. Fame. Wealth. Power. Impunity. Gratification. Sycophants. Drugs. Here is a man who has overindulged in all of these in gargantuan proportions, indulged until he is a great big sodden bag of shit, slumped and sludgy and spongy on the inside, like everything in there has been steeping in a Coca-Cola bath for 30 years. Too spoiled and indolent for the meager work of sussing out a single thought's contours and borders, to say nothing of connecting it to another, without some Waylon Smithers at hand to do the lifting for him.


He also looks like shit! He looks like the answer to the question "What if toadies emitted gamma radiation." He looks like somebody made an applehead Martin Bormann doll, sprayed it with vegetable oil, and dressed it up like it was going trick-or-treating as Maverick from Top Gun. I wouldn't let him pet my dog.


Original.


He's always watching

He's always watching