Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Tuesday, May 14, 2024

Louisiana goddamn!

Louisiana (Republican) lawmakers are insisting on keeping a state law that forces even child rape victims to carry the child to term. No abortions. Period. 

This is just madness. Forced pregnancies, even for children? Male insanity. Male ignorance and indifference to the realities of pregnancy. This all springs from their religion, although they don't want to admit it. We have a clear case of a religion warping social and health policy. Religion, probably the source of more sexual abuse of children than any other institution or profession, claims the high ground on these issues and the right to create policy, when they should be kept far away from the halls of power. Some 77% of Louisiana voters favor exceptions for rape or incest. This will not stand for long.


Louisiana lawmakers insist child rape victims must carry their pregnancy to term

MAY 14, 2024

Former President Donald Trump, now the presumptive Republican nominee, boasts that he "broke Roe v. Wade." In the aftermath, according to Trump, "states are working very brilliantly" to impose various restrictions on abortion and creating "very beautiful harmony."


Over the last few days, this process has played out in Louisiana. Lawmakers in the Pelican State voted to continue to require child rape victims to carry their pregnancy to term. 


After Roe v. Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court, Louisiana, along with 13 other states, imposed a ban on abortion at all stages of pregnancy. The only exceptions to Louisiana's ban are when an abortion is necessary to save the life of the mother or in cases of "medically futile" pregnancy, when the fetus has a fatal abnormality. Doctors in the state "who perform illegal abortions can face up to 15 years in prison and steep fines of $10,000 to $200,000."


In February, Louisana Representative Delisha Boyd (D) introduced legislation that proposed exceptions for rape and incest to Louisiana's abortion ban. When it became clear that the proposal would fail, Boyd narrowed her bill to allow persons 16 years old and younger to have an abortion if they were the victim of rape or incest. 


The legislation was grounded in Boyd's personal experience. She was born after her mother was raped by a man when she was 15 years old. Boyd said that her mother suffered years of trauma before dying at 30.

 

Neelima Sukhavasi, an obstetrician from Baton Rouge, urged the members of the Louisiana House Committee on Criminal Justice to approve Boyd's bill. Sukhavasi said that since Louisiana imposed its abortion ban in 2022, "[s]he and her colleagues have delivered babies for pregnant teenagers, including mothers as young as 13." She told the committee, "[o]ne of these teenagers delivered a baby while clutching a Teddy Bear — and that's an image that once you see that, you can't unsee it." According to Sukhavasi, these girls "can experience health complications that affect them for the rest of their lives."

Nevertheless, the committee rejected Boyd's bill last week on a 7 to 4 vote. All seven Republicans on the committee voted against creating the exception for child rape victims. One legislator who voted against creating the exception, Representative Lauren Ventrella (R), said she believed "teenagers who had consensual sex might feign rape or incest in order to get access to abortion service." Another legislator in opposition, Representative Dodie Horton (R), said rape should be punished, but she "cannot condone killing the innocent."


Louisiana politics has long been dominated by anti-abortion advocates. But, on this issue, the legislature is out of step with their constituents. A 2023 survey found that 77% of Louisiana voters supported an abortion exception for rape and incest. A survey this year by The Times-Picayune found a majority of Louisiana voters also support allowing abortion for any reason up to 15 weeks of pregnancy. 

Louisiana legislators push to classify abortion pills as controlled dangerous substances

Anti-abortion lawmakers in Louisiana are also pushing a bill that would classify abortion medication as Schedule IV drugs, the same treatment as opioids. If the bill becomes law, Louisiana would be the first state in the country to classify mifepristone and misoprostol as controlled dangerous substances.


Under Senate Bill 276, anyone who possesses mifepristone or misoprostol – the two pills used in a medication abortion – without a valid prescription could face up to “five years in prison and $5,000 in fines.” The bill includes an exemption for pregnant women who use the drugs for their “own consumption.” But it still makes acquiring abortion drugs for future use – a practice known as advanced provision – effectively illegal.

 

The proposed law also “appears to target people who might obtain abortion medications in order to distribute them to pregnant people,” WWNO New Orleans Public Radio notes. In Louisiana, distributing or manufacturing controlled substances is a punishable offense “with up to 10 years in prison and $15,000 in fines.” According to the bill’s author, State Senator Thomas Pressly (R), the aim is to take the pills “away from people who are stockpiling these drugs for whatever reason.” The bill, which was written in collaboration with Louisiana Right to Life, also seeks to “create a new crime of ‘coerced criminal abortion by means of fraud,’” Pressly said in a press release. More than 240 Louisiana doctors said the proposed classification is “not scientifically based” and wrote that it could result in “unjustified mistrust by patients and fear of the medication.”


Critics also warn that the new penalties could discourage health providers from prescribing mifepristone and misoprostol and make pharmacies reluctant to fill out those prescriptions. Abortion medication is currently the most popular method of ending a pregnancy. The drugs targeted by Pressly’s bill also have uses outside of abortions: mifepristone is used to treat Cushing’s syndrome, a hormonal disorder, and given for miscarriage treatment. Meanwhile, misoprostol is prescribed to treat ulcers and is sometimes used to help patients give birth.

The state of maternal care in Louisiana 

Louisiana's limited exceptions for the life of the patient and "medically futile" pregnancies are both extremely narrow and poorly defined. But the state's anti-abortion officials have promised to prosecute doctors for any perceived violations. A recent report by Physicians for Human Rights and other reproductive rights advocates concluded that Louisiana's abortion ban violates "federal law meant to protect patient access to emergency care, disregard[s] evidence-based public health guidance, degrade[s] long-standing medical ethical standards, and, worst of all, den[ies] basic human rights to Louisianans seeking reproductive health care in their state."

Specifically, "initial prenatal care in Louisiana is being pushed deeper into pregnancy, often beyond the first trimester when miscarriage is more common—purposely delayed to avoid the risk of miscarriage care being misconstrued as an abortion in violation of the bans." As a result, pregnant women are "struggling to access time-sensitive, appropriate care for early pregnancy and miscarriages."


Louisiana is already "among the U.S. states with the lowest number of employed obstetricians and gynecologists (OB-GYNs) in the country with the majority of its parishes having less than two per 100,000 residents." This shortage is unlikely to dissipate as obstetricians and gynecologists in the state put themselves at risk of prosecution for providing basic prenatal care. 


Louisiana's House Committee on Criminal Justice also considered legislation last week to "insulate physicians and other health care providers from facing abortion-related charges if they were only trying to treat a pregnant person’s unavoidable miscarriage or troubled pregnancy." At the hearing, Louisiana doctors testified that they were afraid of being thrown in jail for treating pregnant patients. The legislation was rejected by the committee

 



Friday, May 10, 2024

Thief!

A thief came our way recently, quietly, secretly, stupidly. They stole part of a plant that I was growing in our front yard. I'll bet this kind of thing happens frequently around here. The wife  & I have walked up and down most of the streets here on our little island, and there are some really beautiful plants and landscaping in some folks front yards. I have even entertained the idea of pilfering something myself from someone else's yard, but haven't. I didn't think it would be very nice, and I'd like to think of myself as a nice person. 

But some not-so-nice person snipped off a flower stalk from a plumeria plant in my front yard. And it's not like the plant is bordering the street and easy to snip. You have to walk about 30' onto my property to get to that plant, halfway up my driveway. Funny thing is, I had been looking for the first flower stalk on these plants and had noticed the new flower stalk the day before. Even took a picture of it. The next morning I was taking out the trash and glanced over at it and noticed the flower stalk was gone! It wasn't lying on the ground close to the plant anywhere, and there were no newly-fallen palm fronds that can slash your face or take your arm off if you're not paying attention. 

It was the only one out of the 4 plumerias in that spot that had formed a flower stalk, and it was the only flower stalk on that plant. That stalk had about 20 buds on it already, but hadn't bloomed yet. It was going to be glorious. I don't know how familiar you are with plumeria flowers, but this one, a Singapore White, has a simply heavenly fragrance that can take me right back to Hawaii. Just a wonderful aroma. Indescribably awesome. 

As far as I know, you cannot force an un-bloomed plumeria flower stalk to bloom. Putting it in water won't work. Putting it in soil won't work. So this ... person ruined a perfectly fine flower stalk. For no good reason. Because stupid? Makes me think it was a Trumper, but that's a cop-out. Not all Trumpers are thieves. Brainless, sure, but probably not thieves.

I grow plumerias and have lots of them in the back yard in all stages of growth and blooming. I would have happily given one to this ... person if they'd asked. 

In the grand scheme of things, it's not that big of a deal, right? Duh. Like I said, I have a lot of them in the back yard, which fortunately no one has invaded. Yet. But it still bugs me. On the bright side, the last time we had criminals visit our property (in Houston) they took their time, trashed everything in the house and stole all my underwear!! Didn't take my wife's underwear. Even took the ceiling fans. And took the pillow cases off of our pillows so they could stuff them full of loot. Left the pillows, though. So this theft is pretty, uh, minor. 

Still...assholes! 

Wednesday, May 8, 2024

Molly Jong-Fast

Molly, daughter of Erica Jong, is a writer currently working for Vanity Fair magazine. Molly is a reliably level-headed writer, and not one prone to absurd conspiracy theories. It feels like she is talking directly to me in this column. I am guilty of tuning out the news entirely for different periods of time, if only to preserve my sanity. But I do realize that it is counterproductive. We cannot let the billionaires and fascists win. We MUST turn out in huge numbers this coming election to save our democracy.

How to Survive the Forever Election

The only way to keep democracy going is to participate in it.
MAY 6, 2024

I don’t know about you, but it feels to me like it’s been the 2024 election forever—or at least since 2022. The past year and a half has been such an exhausting series of emotional ups and downs for those of us who worry about the fate of democracy, so it’s understandable why anyone would want to ignore the news cycle entirely. The cold reality, however, is that the Great Tune-Out is precisely the opposite of what we need in order for democracy to survive. Because if there is one way of sinking Donald Trump’s political prospects, it’s by getting more Americans to appreciate the fact that this year’s forever election could be its last.

Remember the 2022 midterms, which pundit after pundit warned would result in a catastrophic “red wave” that would just about put Democrats out of order? Well, that wave, as we now know, never materialized. Trump’s chosen Senate candidates, from Mehmet Oz to Blake Masters to Herschel Walker, received a walloping electoral beatdown from their opponents. And that happened thanks to the sea of Democratic voters who felt galvanized by the GOP assaults on abortion and democracy—a phenomenon that Joe Biden needs to replicate if he has any hope of being reelected.

The only problem is that this time around, it’s not Trump’s candidates who are on the ballot; it’s Trump. And the former president has a unique ability to make Americans feel incredibly disenchanted with politics. For one thing, ever since the midterms, Americans have watched Trump systematically weasel nearly every trial and indictment that they ever hoped might hold him accountable. It also doesn’t help that the Supreme Court has thrown him lifeline after lifeline: In March, for instance, it decided that, despite Trump’s incitement of an insurrection, states could not block him from appearing on the primary ballot. More recently, some high court justices also indicated, in all their wisdom, that presidents should receive some level of immunity for alleged crimes, with inane hypotheticals posed by Trump superfans Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. Both of these cases show pretty clearly that the conservative-led court is very much in the tank for its guy—hardly a comforting thought for those of us who were hoping that America’s juridical guardrails might stop the country from becoming an authoritarian nightmare.

Which brings us back to how we’re all so stressed out: This isn’t our first rodeo. We’ve all been through one Trump administration, during which consuming news was like drinking out of a fire hose—every day, it seemed, another scandal would come galloping out of the White House. Remember when Scott Pruitt, then the head of the EPA, usednearly $3,000 in taxpayer money to buy tactical pants and tactical polos? When Trump said he was interested in buying Greenland? And when he toyed with the idea of firing missiles into Mexico?

All of this, of course, is to say nothing of Trump’s handling of a once-in-a-lifetime global pandemic. Growing up, my grandfather used to tell stories about what it was like being a kid during the 1918 influenza pandemic, which vastly expanded America’s awareness of mass sickness and disease. I thought the COVID crisis might also foster a better public understanding of public health—and maybe even an appreciation of how important it is to arrest climate change. WRONG. Republicans instead used the pandemic to put America’s already tenuous relationship with truth and reason on life support.

Recall just a few of Trump’s suggested home remedies, which included “[hitting] the body with a tremendous” ultraviolet light; taking the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine, which didn’t work; and using horse dewormer ivermectin, which also didn’t work. Meanwhile, Trump’s supporters—many of whom became rabidly anti-vax—got sick from taking his medical advice. In fact, Yale researchers who studied COVID effects in Florida and Ohio found that “excess mortality was significantly higher for Republican voters than Democratic voters after COVID-19 vaccines were available to all adults, but not before.” This is to say that Trump literally killed his own voters—and they seemed not to blame him for it. And if March 2020 wasn’t already traumatic enough for the nation, Trump followed it up with another once-in-a-lifetime event, inciting an insurrection less than a year later.

The postpandemic, post-insurrection political environment is liable to make anyone feel deeply tired and news-avoidant. People, after all, are scared. They remember the ill-conceived mood around the 2016 election, when they were sure that the normal candidate would win, and then they didn’t. Even today, I sometimes get stopped on the street by people wondering if they should set their expectations accordingly. “Is it going to be alright?” they ask, drawing me in closer.

The thing is, I can’t tell you it’s going to be alright, because I really don’t know. I know what Trump promises to do if he gets back in office—and I know that it’s the stuff of nightmares. Trump will expand the executive branch so much as to essentially become king. And while that might make some voters want to close their eyes, shut their ears, and tune politics out of their daily life, the only way we can avoid it is by paying attention so that what happened in 2016 doesn’t happen in 2024.

Original.


Monday, May 6, 2024

Scrubbed!

2 hours before scheduled liftoff, they scrubbed the first voyage of the Boeing Starliner. It's already been delayed by years, what's a few more...months? Weeks? Days? These things happen a lot in the world of rocketry.

The launch window extends thru Tuesday, so they might get it up then, but, who knows? Better safe than sorry, of course. You don't launch until every little thing is set. No doubt the 2 astronauts, Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, agree.

I was trying to tune into the NASA YouTube channel to watch the launch but somehow got deflected (hijacked?) over to another channel featuring Elon Musk live at Starbase in Texas  "celebrating" the upcoming Boeing Starliner launch, while at the same time hawking cryptocurrencies in front of a crowd of people. It went on and on. 

"Just click that QR Code." 

"This opportunity is only available today." 

He sounded like a huckster up on stage, trying to get people to invest in SpaceX and cryptocurrency together and "doubling your Bitcoin" IIRC. 

"Invest in the future of space travel and the future of finance."

Did I just enter The Twilight Zone?

"Hey, would you like a piece of Mars? How about a really ugly truck?" 

Was that Rod Serling? Elon Musk? Hmmm.....


He's always watching

He's always watching