Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Thursday, September 12, 2024

same old same old

Here's a nice analysis in Salon of Kamala Harris' dismantling of the orange gasbag at the Sept 10 debate. As expected, the orange coward says he will NOT debate Harris again. The liar and thief says he WON the debate and why should the winner do a rematch? He simply cannot tell the truth, especially if the truth happens to reveal some kind of weakness on his part. No! Trump STRONG! And all the MAGAts sigh deeply and buy more of his AI bullshit.

"The same old, tired playbook": Harris baits an aging Trump into being his grumpiest, weirdest self

Even with the muted microphones, there is no "sane-washing" Trump during the debate

By AMANDA MARCOTTE

Senior Writer, Salon

A few watchwords of Tuesday night's presidential debate in Philadelphia were "same," "old" and "tired." 

"I’m going to tell you on this debate tonight, you’re going to hear from the same old, tired playbook, a bunch of lies, grievances and name-calling," Vice President Kamala Harris said in the first few moments of the debate. It was a response to Donald Trump's first comments and she didn't portray him as scary, so much as sad. After he let loose with another round of lies about January 6, she said, "perhaps we do not have, in the candidate to my right, the temperament or the ability to not be confused about fact." 

Harris never said Trump, as a person, is too old to be president. She didn't need to. He was glowering through pink-rimmed eyes under his combover, every inch the mean man everyone avoids at the retirement home. She even avoided the viral word of the campaign: "Weird." But she didn't need to say it because Trump kept saying weird things like, "I have been a leader on fertilization.” Harris, meanwhile, kept her jabs like "exhausted" and "old" focused strictly on Trump's tactics and policies. 

But everyone can tell that it's not Trump's policies that need a nap; it's the cranky old man himself. 

It's an ironic twist. Trump spent months hammering President Joe Biden with the age issue, successfully driving down Biden's poll numbers until victory seemed impossible. With Harris as the nominee, however, Trump must live with the consequences of making age-related decline matter so much to voters. Trump's age is also tied to his backward ideas, authoritarian grasping, and ugly tactics, which Harris routinely dismisses as having worn out their welcome. During a pre-debate interview with radio host Rickey Smiley, Harris said of Trump, "He plays from this really old and tired playbook, right?"

Old, weird, and tired: Trump knew those were the words he had to contend with going into the debate. Yet he couldn't help but prove the charge. As practiced a liar as Trump is, he can't hide who he is and how much worse he's getting. He spent the debate vomiting out all the weirdest right-wing conspiracy theories as though he was a scowling human embodiment of an illiterate MAGA meme. He belched out a bizarre fantasy that doctors commit "execution after birth," which drew a fact check from moderator Linsey Davis. He yelled a lie about how immigrants are "eating the dogs" and "eating the cats,"which triggered another fact check by moderator David Muir. He sounded very much like a chatbot programmed to speak only in far-right phrases, except worse, because it's shorting out. If that sounds like an exaggeration, it's not. He literally said, at one point, "she wants to do transgender operations on illegal aliens that are in prison."

Harris, who has always nailed those "Jim in 'The Office'"-style reactions, took full advantage. She spent much of the debate staring at Trump in disbelief, while he refused to even look in her direction. After one of his unhinged rants, she simply reacted with, "Talk about extreme," punctuated with a giggle. The choice was visible on the split screen: Harris, the normal, competent politician; Trump is Gramps wandering in the streets without his pants on because he won't take his medication. As Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg said, "He’s really doubling down on the crazy uncle vibe this evening.

He’s really doubling down on the crazy uncle vibe this evening.
228.1K
Reply
Copy link

Certainly, the MAGA commentariat on Twitter understood that things were not going well for their man, including Erick Erickson lamenting that Trump "SAYS STUPID SH*T."

YOU STUPID MF’ers JUST GOT TRUMP TO REPEAT YOUR LIE ABOUT THE PETS. CONGRATS ON SETTING THE NEWS STORIES TOMORROW BY LYING SO TRUMP PICKS IT UP AND SAYS STUPID SHIT.

"People leave his rallies early, out of exhaustion and boredom," Harris said at one point. It worked on two levels. First, it caused Trump to freak out. Second, it created a rare moment of national unity, as everyone can empathize with the almost physical need to leave any space that Trump is filling with his manic, endless blather. That Harris stood there and endured with a smile was a feat of strength enough to impress anyone.

But Harris didn't just bait Trump into showing off how much age has degraded his already low levels of coherence. She also tied it to his anger and authoritarianism. When Trump puked out his bizarre lie about how "I read where she said she was not Black and now she says that she is Black," Harris sighed and replied, "Honestly, I think it's a tragedy that we have someone who wants to be president who has consistently, over the course of his career, attempted to use race to divide the American people." The message was sent: Vote for this man, and be exhausted of four more years of listening to this deranged nonsense.

Democrats and left-leaning political commentators have grown especially frustrated in recent weeks with the mainstream media for ignoring how Trump is falling apart. Trump used to talk out of both sides of his mouth, but he's gotten much worse now that he's 78 years old. As Dan Pfeiffer wrote in his newsletter, "While he was never a particularly cogent orator, Trump devolved into someone who spews nonstop nonsense; he frequently misspeaks, refers to people by the wrong name, and constantly loses his train of thought."

Beltway journalists have fallen into a bad habit of rewriting Trump's babbling monologues so that they sound like coherent political speeches. For instance, when Trump was recently asked about childcare policy, he let loose with, "I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I’m talking about . . . child care is child care. You have to have it — in this country you have to have it," before going into a rant about tariffs. This was characterized by the New York Times as Trump saying "he would prioritize legislation on the issue but offered no specifics." This imposes a coherence that wasn't there and is also flatly untrue, as Trump never said it was a priority. 

Media critic Parker Molloy dubbed this practice "sane-washing," arguing that "it’s a form of misinformation" that presents news consumers "with a version of Trump that bears little resemblance to reality." Real-life Trump is not the normal politician presented in news coverage but is, as the Harris campaign memorably noted in July, "old and quite weird." Luckily, Molloy's coinage of "sane-washing" seems to be a wake-up call, especially after Lawrence O'Donnell of MSNBC picked it up.

Sound up! Lawrence O'Donnell destroys the @nytimes for sane washing Donald J. Trump on his tariffs pay for childcare nonsense. "There was a time not so long ago when everyone...at the NYT knew what a tariff is" The New York Times "hallucinated that explanation into existence." Show more

On Monday, the New York Times seemed to hear the criticism. "As Debate Looms, Trump Is Now the One Facing Questions About Age and Capacity," read the headline of an article published on the front page. Instead of trying to make sense of Trump's word salads, Peter Baker wrote, "Trump’s rambling speeches, sometimes incoherent statements and extreme outbursts have raised questions about his own cognitive health." 

After last night's debate performance, hopefully, the questions about Trump's basic brain functionality will grow even louder. One of the biggest issues with Trump is every trait he has and everything he does is terrible, paralyzing efforts to narrow down criticisms into something digestible. The Harris campaign made their choice to focus on how Trump is old and weird. In this debate, Harris successfully zeroed in on that narrative, hitting it over and over. Now every garbled statement or odd behavior from Trump will reinforce her message. Luckily for her, Trump can no more stop acting weird than he can stop wearing orange makeup. 

Original.



Wednesday, September 11, 2024

debate in brief

Kudos to EarlG, one of the primary administrators at Democratic Underground. He does amazing work on the website and creates multiple hilarious memes responding to the events of the day. Proud to be a member of that site.



Tuesday, September 10, 2024

Taylor Swift

Taylor Swift endorses Kamala, as we figured she would. She published this shortly after the Trump/Harris debate this evening. 

I could not watch the whole debate uninterrupted, but I recorded it on a few channels so I can dissect it a bit tomorrow. When Trump scowls and starts in on how horrible everything is, how the Dems are destroying the economy and the world, I have to mute the orange bastard. Nothing but lies and dystopia coming from his anus-like mouth.

Kamala appeared cool, calm and collected. All that Trump sells is anger and vengeance, while calling everyone names. Such a nasty person.

Here is the text of the message Taylor sent out:

Like many of you, I watched the debate tonight. If you haven’t already, now is a great time to do your research on the issues at hand and the stances these candidates take on the topics that matter to you the most. As a voter, I make sure to watch and read everything I can about their proposed policies and plans for this country.
Recently I was made aware that AI of ‘me’ falsely endorsing Donald Trump’s presidential run was posted to his site. It really conjured up my fears around AI, and the dangers of spreading misinformation. It brought me to the conclusion that I need to be very transparent about my actual plans for this election as a voter. The simplest way to combat misinformation is with the truth.
I will be casting my vote for Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in the 2024 Presidential Election. I’m voting for @kamalaharris because she fights for the rights and causes I believe need a warrior to champion them. I think she is a steady-handed, gifted leader and I believe we can accomplish so much more in this country if we are led by calm and not chaos. I was so heartened and impressed by her selection of running mate @timwalz, who has been standing up for LGBTQ+ rights, IVF, and a woman’s right to her own body for decades.
I’ve done my research, and I’ve made my choice. Your research is all yours to do, and the choice is yours to make. I also want to say, especially to first time voters: Remember that in order to vote, you have to be registered! I also find it’s much easier to vote early. I’ll link where to register and find early voting dates and info in my story.
With love and hope,
Taylor Swift
Childless Cat Lady



Monday, September 9, 2024

Mary L Trump

Mary Trump, an American psychologist, writer, and niece of former president Donald Trump, has been doing her part to alert America to her uncle's dangerous tendencies. 

So not all Trumps are horrible, obviously. Fred Trump III (Mary's older brother) is also a good guy who might do some campaigning for Kamala Harris. 

Mary writes a Substack "The Good in Us," and now hosts an online program called "Ask Mary Anything (Within Reason)." And she also has a new book coming out this week called "Who Could Ever Love You" with more memoirs of the Trump family. I just want Donold gone. Keep Mary and Fred III and ditch the rest of the Grifter Gang. Half of them probably belong in jail. 



Translating the Crazy
Corporate Media Turns a Blind Eye

Sept 8, 2024 - Mary L. Trump

UPDATES: I got COVID sixteen days ago and, though I am substantially better, I’m still exhausted. I know every case is different, but is this normal? Anyway, with my book coming out on Tuesday, there will be no rest for the weary any time soon. More book news after today’s piece.

Donald appeared at the Economic Club of New York last week, and spoke to a group of economists, business leaders and journalists today. He was asked the following question”


“If you win in November, can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make childcare affordable? And if so, what specific piece of legislation will you advance?”


This was what he said (which was neither a response nor an answer):


Well, I would do that, and we're sitting down, I was somebody, we had Senator Marco Rubio and my daughter Ivanka was so impactful on that issue. It's a very important issue, but I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about that because look, childcare is childcare [emphasis mine]. There's something, you have to have it in this country, you have to have it. But when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign nations at levels that they're not used to, but they'll get used to it very quickly, and it's not going to stop them from doing business with us, but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country. Those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about, including childcare, that it's going to take care.

I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time, coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country, because I have to stay with childcare. I want to stay with childcare. But those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I'm talking about, including growth, but growth also headed up by what the plan is that I just told you about. We're going to be taking in trillions of dollars, and as much as childcare is talked about as being expensive, it's relatively speaking, not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taking in. We're going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people, and then we'll worry about the rest of the world. Let's help other people, but we're going to take care of our country first. This is about America first. It's about make America great again. We have to do it because right now we're a failing nation, so we'll take care of.

I defy anybody who was actually trying to follow the thread of that gibberish to tell me what it means. Nobody can. The only phrase that has any logical consistency, “childcare is childcare,” also happens to be the only thing Donald said that’s true—childcare is, after all, childcare. The rest of it is just disjointed riffing coupled with his greatest hits and catch phrases.


The corporate media, however, have decided that it is no longer the job of its journalists and pundits to report and analyze information; rather they believe they must translate Donald’s nonsensical ramblings into a version of the English language we can all understand. That’s a huge problem because, on the one hand, they’re not really translating his words—they’re imbuing them with a meaning that is not there; on the other hand, they’re doing this without telling us they’re doing it.


So, according to Politico, Donald, “laid out a sweeping economic vision of lower taxes, higher tariffs, and light-touch regulation in a speech to top Wall Street execs.”


AP chimed in by claiming that Donald “suggests tariffs can help solve rising child care costs in a major economic speech.”


The New York Times, at the forefront when it comes to covering for Donald, ran the following headline and sub-head:


“Trump Praises Tariffs, and William McKinley, to Power Brokers

In an address about the kind of economy he hopes to build for the 21st century, the former president harked back to the end of another century: the 19th.”


The article that followed, which also referred to Donald’s stream-of-consciousness as a “speech,” claimed that he “tried to define how his stewardship of the economy would differ from that of his Democratic opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris. He has tried to put the economy at the center of the election, hoping to seize on voters' dissatisfaction with inflation and the cost of living.” They, of course, failed to mention that Donald tries “to put the economy at the center of the election” by lying, making stuff up, and being generally incomprehensible.


Perhaps worst of all, when Donald’s nonsense is impossible to place in a context within which a generous person might render them somewhat coherent, certain news outlets simply ignore him, as they did when he recently ranted about the elusive relationship between bacon and wind:


 “Some people don’t eat bacon anymore,” Donald said. “We are going to get the energy prices down. This was caused by their horrible energy. Wind. They want wind all over the place. But when it doesn’t blow, we have a little problem.”


Apparently (I say apparently because there is literally no way to make these statements coherent), he was trying to connect his lies about high bacon prices with his lies about wind energy. He keeps telling these easily debunked lies because, as Daniel Dale, chronicler of Donald’s mendacity, pointed out, “By virtue of shameless perseverance, [Donald] often manages to outlast most of the media’s willingness to correct any particular falsehood.” In other words, while Donald never gets tired of lying, the media gets tired of doing its job.


Meanwhile, Paul Krugman wrote recently, a normal candidate like Kamala Harris is pressed by reporters and commentators to


provide more detail about her policy proposals, but the truth is that we have a pretty good idea what she will do on most issues if she wins — which can’t be said about her opponent.

For Trump doesn’t have coherent policy views; he has prejudices, some of them based on sheer petulance, that are impervious to facts. And his childishness and lack of connection to reality, while present all along, seem to have grown worse as he approaches 80.

It’s deeply disturbing that somebody as unhinged and incoherent as Donald is allowed to run for the presidency in the first place (and that leaves aside all of the other disqualifying things about him), but the disturbance is compounded when you consider that corporate media can’t seem to muster any urgency in the face of Donald’s increasingly bizarre behavior. On any given day, he is demonstrably untethered from reality—and it often seems that the reason the warning lights aren’t constantly flashing red is because nobody covering him expects otherwise.


Surely a political press corps that spent months arguing that President Biden’s age rendered him mentally unfit, wouldn’t look the other way when the Republican candidate, the oldest person to run for president in American history, is not only old but decompensating before our very eyes. The difference of course is that Biden is aging while Donald is dementing.


It’s ok to wonder if you’re missing something when you see clips of Donald’s incomprehensible ranting and then The New York Times acts as if there is nothing out of the ordinary going on. Apparently, Donald’s treating a fictional cannibalistic serial killer as if he’s a real person—who also happens to be Donald’s good friend and who, according to Donald, wants to have his followers for dinner—falls within normal parameters for the leader of the Republican Party.


It's not new that corporate media applies a completely different standard to the Democratic candidate, but it should be news. While they clamor for Harris to outline how much her childcare plan will cost, for example, nobody seems to be asking about the economic impact of Donald’s plan to round up, imprison, and deport up to 15 million undocumented workers (let alone the horrific knock-on effects of such a breath-taking act of violence). As it is, I now know far more about Vice President Harris’ views on fracking than I do about Donald’s healthcare plan beyond the fact that he wants to repeal the Affordable Care Act, upon which 45 million Americans currently rely.


A former occupant of the Oval Office, a convicted felon and adjudicated rapist who attempted a coup, is desperately flailing while his campaign is failing to gain any traction. Donald is a frightened, desperate man knowing, as he does, that his continued freedom might well depend on his ability to get back into the White House so he can make the still-pending federal cases against him disappear. His increasingly fantastical pronouncements and worsening psychiatric disorders strike me as being newsworthy.


As Daniel Dale said, Donald really does seem to have worn down the corporate media’s willingness to cover him properly. It’s too bad—they’re missing a story most people would be interested in. 


American democracy depends upon a thriving fourth estate to function optimally. That’s not what we have right now. Not even close. Independent media is doing its best to step up, but there is still a void left by the failures of those traditional outlets people have been relying on for decades. They are failing us, settling for “both-sides” laziness at the expense of objective facts and, ultimately, democracy. The American people deserve to know what we’re up against. We deserve to be told that there’s a maniac on the loose.





remember

remember

deja vu

deja vu

indeed

indeed

Probably

Probably

Delete Fox "News"

Delete Fox "News"

Smells really bad

Smells really bad

Applies to Trump

Applies to Trump

Trump is the enemy

Trump is the enemy

2024 Election

2024 Election

$132 billion

$132 billion

Remember

Remember

too true

too true

Didn't realize the GOP hated America so much.

Didn't realize the GOP hated America so much.