Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Tuesday, May 13, 2014

Nat'l Climate Assessment

Been hearing anything about the new climate report that the Obama administration has put together?  It's called the National Climate Assessment.



I finally found a link here.

A review of the main findings is here.

I think it was David Suzuki on the most-recent Bill Moyer's show that said that this NCA did not include anything on the recent ice sheet melting in Antarctica.  The report does include Antarctica, but those recent ice sheets could raise sea levels by at least one meter, and it could happen, uh...at anytime?  

There goes the beach house!  Maybe...

Monday, May 12, 2014

blatant liars

Something is rotten in Denmark.

Meaning: something has gone really wrong in Washington D.C. with our politics.  The GOP has decided to just lie and lie and lie, regardless of the truth, regardless of the facts.  We see it in the national GOP and we see it up close in Texas in the guise of Dan Patrick, currently in a run-off with the incumbent David Dewhurst for the Republican nomination for Texas Lieutenant Governor.

What can we do about one political party that just does not care about the truth, but lies blatantly to influence their uneducated and intellectually lazy base?

Paul Krugman sees it and wrote about it recently.

Inventing a Failure

by Paul Krugman, New York Times
Last week, House Republicans released a deliberately misleading report on the status of health reform, crudely rigging the numbers to sustain the illusion of failure in the face of unexpected success. Are you shocked?

You aren’t, but you should be. Mainstream politicians didn’t always try to advance their agenda through lies, damned lies and — in this case — bogus statistics. And the fact that this has become standard operating procedure for a major party bodes ill for America’s future.

About that report: The really big policy news of 2014, at least so far, is the spectacular recovery of the Affordable Care Act from its stumbling start, thanks to an extraordinary late surge that took enrollment beyond early projections. The age mix of enrollees has improved; insurance companies are broadly satisfied with the risk pool. Multiple independent surveys confirmt hat the percentage of Americans without health insurance has already declined substantially, and there’s every reason to believe that over the next two years the act will meet its overall goals, except in states that refuse to expand Medicaid.

This is a problem for Republicans, who have bet the ranch on the proposition that health reform is an unfixable failure. “Nobody can make Obamacare work,” declared Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, a couple of weeks ago (when it was already obvious that it was working pretty well). How can they respond to good news?

Well, they could graciously admit that they were wrong, and offer constructive suggestions about how to make the law work even better. Oh, sorry — I forgot that I wasn’t writing jokes for the White House Correspondents’ Dinner.

No, they have in fact continued to do what they’ve been doing ever since the news on Obamacare started turning positive: sling as much mud as possible at health reform, in the hope that some of it sticks. Premiums were soaring, they declared, when they have actually come in below projections. Millions of people were losing coverage, they insisted, when the great bulk of those whose policies were canceled simply replaced them with new policies. The Obama administration was cooking the books, they cried (projection, anyone?). And, of course, they keep peddling horror stories about people suffering terribly from Obamacare, not one of which has actually withstood scrutiny.

Now comes the latest claim — that many of the people who signed up for insurance aren’t actually paying their premiums. Obviously this claim is part of a continuing pattern. It also, however, involves a change in tactics. Previous attacks on Obamacare were pretty much fact-free; this time the claim was backed by an actual survey purporting to show that a third of enrollees hadn’t paid their first premium.

But the survey was rigged. (Are you surprised?) It asked insurers how many enrollees had paid their first premium; it ignored the fact that the first premium wasn’t even due for the millions of people who signed up for insurance after March 15.

And the fact that the survey was so transparently rigged is a smoking gun, proving that the attacks on Obamacare aren’t just bogus; they’re deliberately bogus. The staffers who set up that survey knew enough about the numbers to skew them, which meant that they have to have known that Obamacare is actually doing O.K.

So why are Republicans doing this? Sad to say, there’s method in their fraudulence.

First of all, it fires up the base. After this latest exercise in deception, we can be fairly sure that Republican leaders know perfectly well that Obamacare has failed to fail. But the party faithful don’t. Like anyone who writes about these issues, I get vast amounts of mail from people who know, just know, that insurance premiums are skyrocketing, that far more people have lost insurance because of Obummercare than have gained it, that all the horror stories are real, and that anyone who says otherwise is just a liberal shill.

Beyond that, the constant harping on alleged failure works as innuendo even if each individual claim collapses in the face of evidence. A recent poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that a majority of Americans know that more than eight million people enrolled in health exchanges; but it also found a majority of respondents believing that this was below expectations, and that the law was working badly.

So Republicans are spreading disinformation about health reform because it works, and because they can — there is no sign that they pay any political price when their accusations are proved false.

And that observation should scare you. What happens to the Congressional Budget Office if a party that has learned that lying about numbers works takes full control of Congress? What happens if it regains the White House, too? Nothing good, that’s for sure.


And then we have Dan Patrick in Texas...

Dan Patrick.  Does this man look trustworthy to you?

Texas GOP candidate: It’s a ‘myth’ that Planned Parenthood does ‘anything’ for women’s health

Dan Patrick, a Republican candidate for lieutenant governor in Texas, argued this week that the reason Planned Parenthood clinics were being forced to close throughout the state was because they did not have “anything” to do with women’s health.
During a Republican runoff debate between Patrick and current Lt. Governor David Dewhurst on Wednesday, WFAA moderators pointed out that only about six abortion clinics were able to remain open after the legislature passed strict new laws last year.
Patrick noted that, as a state senator, he had worked with Dewhurst to cut funding for Planned Parenthood.
“This is a myth that Planned Parenthood has anything to do with women’s health,” he opined. “Why are they closing clinics if they’re making money on providing women’s health? They’re closing clinics because they make all their money taking the lives of babies.”
Patrick said that his goal was for Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court ruling that legalized abortion, to be “gone.”
“One day, this nation is going to look back as this nation looks back on slavery from the 1800s and says, ‘What were they thinking then?’” he said. “I’m going to do everything I can do, and the more we can move the envelope to save more lives, you bet.”
“We’re born in the image of God, let’s not make any mistakes that these are babies,” the senator added.
In a statement obtained by Politicus USA, Texas Democratic Party Deputy Communications Director Lisa Paul observed that thousands of Texas women had been provided with health services by Planned Parenthood.
“Texas women are appalled by Dan Patrick’s deplorable statements on women’s health care providers,” Paul said. “158,345 Texans received preventative health care at Planned Parenthood in 2013. Republicans still don’t get it: just trust Texas women. Republicans need to trust us to make our own choices, to consult with our families and our doctors. Dan Patrick doesn’t trust Texas women, so Texas women can’t trust Dan Patrick as Lt. Governor.”

The statement, "This is a myth that Planned Parenthood has anything to do with women's health" is manifestly false and has been disproven time and time again by anyone searching for the truth about the activities of Planned Parenthood in Texas.  PP provides not only preventive healthcare to Texas women and their infants - that the Republican-controlled State of Texas does not fund - it also provides assistance in helping women to conceive.

Does Dan Patrick really not know the truth about PP in Texas?  He claims he is a well-educated Texan, and he's running for the 2nd highest statewide office in the state.  If he really does not know the truth, he either does not want to know the truth or he is pretty damn ignorant.  

Much more likely is that Dan Patrick does know the truth about PP in Texas, but he chooses to lie about it to fire up his base of ignorant "good Christians" who insist on sticking their noses in other peoples business and punishing those who allegedly go against their Bible.  What happened to "get government off of our backs?"

Texas cannot afford to elect a scumbag like Dan Patrick.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

David Suzuki

Bill Moyer's latest guest on his show, Moyers and Company, was David Suzuki.  David makes the excellent point that most of the GOP Congress is guilty of an "intergenerational" crime by denying climate change.  It's not like they got caught with their pants down, in diapers, with a prostitute, cocaine and a million bucks.  This "wilfull blindness" on climate change is harming our generation, and the next one, and the next one.  

After watching this highly recommended show I had quite a surge of hope.  David makes the simple point that WE created the markets and WE created the economy, and so WE can change things.  D'oh!  It would take a critical mass of people working toward a similar goal, of course, but we got into this climate change mess, and we can get out of it (barring something like a gigantic asteroid strike or a super-volcano erupting and blocking out the sun for a decade or more).

OK, forget about that last point.  Watch this 25 minute program and I think you will feel a similar pang of hope.


Time to Get Real on Climate Change
Bill Moyers & Company 

This week, as the White House issued a landmark report detailing the frightening affects of global warming on our country and President Obama took to the airwaves to drive home that message, Bill Moyers talks with a scientist who has sounded the alarm for decades.

For nearly 35 years, David Suzuki has brought science into the homes of millions on the Canadian television series, The Nature of Things. He has become a godfather of the environmental movement, and in a poll of his fellow Canadians last fall he was named that country’s most admired figure. Nonetheless, his outspoken views on climate change and the government’s collusion with the petrochemical industry in developing Canada’s oil-rich tar sands have made him the target of relentless attacks from his nation’s prime minister, corporations and right-wing ideologues.

“Our politicians should be thrown in the slammer for willful blindness. …I think that we are being willfully blind to the consequences for our children and grandchildren. It’s an intergenerational crime,” Suzuki tells Moyers.

Saturday, May 10, 2014

Conchita Wurst

Conchita Wurst, aka Thomas Neuwirth, has won the 59th annual Eurovision Song Contest.  

Doesn't sound that odd until you realize that Conchita is a drag queen, with a beard!  


A Bearded Drag Queen Just Won The Eurovision Song Contest



COPENHAGEN, Denmark (AP) — Austrian bearded drag queen Conchita Wurst won the 59th edition of the Eurovision Song Contest on Saturday with a James Bond-inspired entry that had unleashed a wave of protests in eastern Europe before the competition.
The power ballad, "Rise Like a Phoenix," helped Wurst — the alter ego of 25-year-old Thomas Neuwirth — secure Austria's second victory in the competition with 290 points. The country also won in 1966.
"This is dedicated to everyone who believes in a future of peace and freedom," a tearful Wurst said as she accepted the trophy from Denmark's Emmelie de Forrest, who won the contest last year. "We are unity."
Pushing the boundaries of gender identity is nothing new at Europe's annual song contest, an extravaganza known for its eclectic, sometimes unlistenable lineup of techno beats, love songs and pop tunes. The winner in 1998 was Israel's Dana International, who had male-to-female gender reassignment surgery several years before competing.
Still, Wurst had been faced with some protests before the competition, highlighting a rift between Europe's progressive liberal side and the traditional values and nationalist rhetoric of Russia and some other nations taking part.
Amid growing tensions over the Ukraine crisis, some in Eastern Europe have blasted Wurst as an example of the West's decadence. Activists in Belarus had even urged the country's state television network to bypass the live broadcasting rules by the organizers and edit the Austrian entry out of its Eurovision transmission.
After her victory, Wurst told reporters she hopes gay, lesbian, bi and transgender people around the world are getting stronger in their fight for human rights.
Asked if she had anything to say to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who introduced a law last year prohibiting so-called gay "propaganda," Wurst said, "I don't know if he is watching this now, but if so, I'll say it: 'We're unstoppable.'"
In Vienna, the Austrian capital, fans who had gathered at one of the public viewing parties chanted "Conchita" ecstatically after the victory. Some had painted on fake beards in support.
Neuwirth, who was born in Gmunden, central Austria, entered show business eight years ago, taking part in an Austrian TV talent show. After joining a boy band that quickly broke up, Neuwirth first appeared as Wurst in another Austrian talent show in 2011. She also took part in two reality shows, including one where candidates had to survive in the Namibian desert together with native tribes.
Juries and television viewers across Europe selected her as the winner ahead of The Common Linnets from the Netherlands with 238 points and Swedish singer Sanna Nielsen with 218, meaning next year's contest will be held in Austria.
Other notable entries included Polish group Donatan & Cleo's semi-pornographic show featuring women in low-cut milkmaid outfits and Montenegro's Sergej Cetkovic, who had a faux-ice skater circling around onstage.
The annual competition is supposed to be completely removed from politics. Neither Russia's entry — teenage twins Anastasia and Maria Tolmachevy — nor Ukraine's Mariya Yaremchuk, whose routine included a dancer running in a giant hamster wheel, alluded to the recent tensions between Moscow and Kiev.
Still, every time Russia got votes many in the audience of 10,000 booed, and when Moscow gave its respective eight, 10 and 12 points to Armenia, Azerbaijan and Belarus — all former Soviet republics — more boos were heard.
Many former Soviet republic countries gave their points to neighboring countries, except Ukraine, whose eight points to Austria were decisive for the Danish hosts to declare Wurst had won.
The first Eurovision song contest was held in 1956 in Switzerland, and the contest's most famous winners include ABBA, Celine Dion and Johnny Logan, who won the contest three times — in 1980 and 1987 as a performer, and in 1992 as a songwriter.

Here is a video of "Rise Like a Phoenix."


Friday, May 9, 2014

just imagine

I still think there is much more to the 9/11 story than meets the eye.  But what to do about it?


Thursday, May 8, 2014

political theater

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) is such a breath of fresh air in a stale Senate.  She doesn't mince words, and her stint in Washington, D.C. has not caused her to fall in with lobbyists like most everyone else has.  If we could transplant Warren's fire and bravery into Hillary Clinton's psyche, we would have our next President, and a great one.  

Here, Warren rightly blasts Boehner and the next Benghazi investigation as nothing more than a waste of time and taxpayer money, and slams Gowdy for being a grandstanding idiot. You go, girl!

The Republicans have to know that Benghazi is a dead-end.  If they don't, they really do live in a bubble and are total fucking idiots.  They are grasping at straws because they are morally and intellectually bankrupt. And no one, save a few Democrats, will speak the truth.

Elizabeth Warren Slams Chair of the GOP's New Benghazi Committee 

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) slammed House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) for creating a select committee to investigate the deaths of four American officials in Benghazi. In an e-mailto supporters Friday, Warren called the committee "shameful" and "no-holds-barred political theater," accusing the GOP of exploiting a tragedy for political gain. And for Warren, it's a bit personal.
In the email, Warren notes that she is particularly concerned about Boehner's selection of Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) to chair committee. She recalls testifying before Gowdy in 2011 when she was setting up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. "I know a little bit about the way Trey Gowdy pursues oversight," she writes. "I was on the other end of it when I was setting up the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and I was called to testify before the House."
Warren says Gowdy lacked basic knowledge of the new agency and was a grand-stander, pushing empty political points rather than conducting a serious investigation. She goes out of her way to make Gowdy appear foolish, quoting a Huffington Post account of the hearing that describes Gowdy as mistakenly suggesting that Warren had written rules that were, in fact, direct quotes from a bill passed by Congress.
Warren continues:
As a Senator, I take oversight seriously because it is powerfully important. But Trey Gowdy gives oversight a bad name. The House GOP is on a waste-of-time-and-resources witch hunt and fundraising sideshow, shamefully grasping for any straw to make President Obama, former Secretary Clinton, or Secretary Kerry look bad. This stunt does a disservice to those who serve our country abroad, and it distracts us from issues we should be taking up on behalf of the American people.
With millions of people still out of work and millions more working full time yet still living below the poverty line, with students drowning in debt, with roads and bridges crumbling, is this really what the House Republicans are choosing to spend their time on? Even for guys who have so few solutions to offer that they have voted 54 times to repeal Obamacare, this is a new low. 
Democrats are currently debating whether they should boycott the new committee. Unlike past panels of this sort, the Benghazi committee does not have equal representation from both parties, skewing seven-to-five in favor of the Republicans. Though Warren wouldn't have any direct involvement—the committee is a House-only project—her e-mail blast makes it clear that she's siding with her House counterparts who think the investigation is a sham.

remember

remember

deja vu

deja vu

indeed

indeed

Delete Fox "News"

Delete Fox "News"

Probably

Probably