Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Wednesday, September 4, 2024

The Lord Has Spoken!

If you have not already, you should consider subscribing to God on Substack. Whoever God is, he's a hoot. And God is on our side.

Thou Shalt Not Steal Music For Thy Cult Rallies


Why doesn't Donold use Lara's music instead?


SEP 03, 2024


Dear Humans, 

BEHOLD! Ten days ago, Lara Trump, wife of Donald’s son Eric, dropped a new single called ‘Hero,’ which purports to praise firefighters for their heroism. Her video doth exploit many images of firefighters who perished in the line of duty. The song has been described as “torture” and accused of “violating the Geneva convention.”


For those who revel in the truly awful, here is the music video:

(Sorry, but I cannot include that video here. Moral and esthetic reasons. You will have to follow the link at the bottom to see/hear the awfulness.)


Verily, it is not good. And it is indeed strange to see the co-chair of the Republican National Committee putting forth such music, so close to the election. Are they not concerned about the backlash from releasing such horrid work into the universe? Is Lara merely using this moment to expand her profile? Did she ever flame out on ‘American Idol’? Forsooth, I would love to see Simon Cowell’s judgment of her singing.


This debacle didst also remind me that JD Vance was recently booed with great fervor at a speech given to the International Association of Fire Fighters. Perchance the Trump campaign is worried? If they lose the firefighters, they reason, they have no shot of winning.


AH! But what if Lara put out a hokey song praising them as heroes??


Or mayhaps it is not connected—who can say?


I do know this; the Trump campaign has been stealing popular music from artists since he first started having rallies with his cult. 


Donald has used music without permission from many artists, including Adele, The Rolling Stones, Neil Young, Queen, R.E.M., Bruce Springsteen, Prince, Pharrell Williams, Tom Petty, Elton John, The Beatles (Estate of George Harrison), Linkin Park, Guns N' Roses, Panic! at the Disco, The Village People, Luciano Pavarotti (Estate), Leonard Cohen (Estate), Aerosmith, Ozzy Osbourne, Twisted Sister, Rihanna, Earth, Wind & Fire, The O'Jays, Dexys Midnight Runners, Everlast, Jack White (The White Stripes), Isaac Hayes (Estate), ABBA, Fleetwood Mac, Phil Collins, and Axl Rose.


Many of these artists have pushed back and proceeded with legal action. The financial penalty at this point would likely be in the tens of millions. 


Why doth the Donold campaign steal music when Lara Trump is right there putting out original songs? Is her music somehow not good enough for them?? It’s just as bad as 3 Doors Down…and they played at his inauguration.


I mean, yea, her songs sound like a deer who’s been hit by an SUV and is wildly bleating for its life, only to see RFK Jr. pull over and step out…but at least they’re original! Right?!? Donold could use her music, shine a light on his family’s ‘talents,’ and cease stealing from artists.


However, he seemeth to be having trouble keeping his own cult members awake or from leaving his rallies early because he never doth shut up…so mayhaps he needs bangers like “YMCA” to keep his “basement dwellers” conscious. He shalt be smote for this!


Thou Shalt Not Steal Music For Thy Cult Rallies!


THE LORD HAS SPOKEN!


Can I get an amen? 


Original.



Sunday, September 1, 2024

MeidasTouch

Ok, this MeidasTouch video by Anthony Davis is titled a bit hyperbolically, but it is full of truths to counter the constant lies that Donold spouts. It's well worth the 13:48 that it runs, give or take a commercial here and there. MeidasTouch has done invaluable work since its founding in 2020 during the Covid pandemic by the Meiselas brothers Ben, Brett, and Jordan, true heroes of democracy.


Trump CRUSHED by DEVASTATING Fact-Check that RUINS EVERYTHING For Him

Friday, August 30, 2024

Eugene Robinson

Eugene Robinson is an opinion columnist for the Washington Post. This column focuses on Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery. 

As if we needed any further evidence that Trump does not give a shit for decorum, decency, and rules, they bullied their way into Section 60, one of the most restricted areas at Arlington and took lots of pictures and videos, which are against the rules. They are already using the pics and videos for his campaign, which is strictly prohibited. 

Trump don't care. Tell me, what kind of person stands by tombstones, smiles and gives a thumbs-up for the camera? Are you GLAD these people are dead?! This controversy is not dying away quickly, like a lot of Trump's bullshit. Hopefully his rude actions will alienate even more military personnel from voting for him come November. If you vote for this orange circus clown, you share in the responsibility.

Don’t yawn at Trump’s dishonorable use of Arlington National Cemetery

The candidate who has repeatedly maligned our soldiers couldn’t resist an illegal publicity stunt.

Donald Trump has shown the nation, once again, that he has no shame.

You knew that, of course. But hauling a camera crew to Arlington National Cemetery and exploiting the fresh graves of heroes — using them as props in his presidential campaign — was more than a violation of the cemetery’s rules; it was more, even, than a violation of federal law. It was a deeply dishonorable act by a shockingly dishonorable man.


Just because we are accustomed to this kind of behavior from Trump does not mean we should accept it. Just because he has no sense of honor or appreciation of sacrifice does not mean we have to pretend honor and sacrifice no longer exist. Just because “Trump is an awful person” is an old story does not mean we should yawn at this latest demonstration and quickly move on.  Section 60 at Arlington Cemetery is the resting place of the men and women who most recently gave what Abraham Lincoln called “the last full measure of devotion” to their country. Monday was the third anniversary of the suicide bombing that killed 13 U.S. troops during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. There is nothing wrong with a former president visiting those graves to commemorate that terrible day.


There is everything wrong, though, with that former president using the occasion to generate visual fodder for his bid to return to the White House. Trump brought along a photographer and videographer from his campaign to capture images of the visit — which his campaign team knew, and he surely knew, was forbidden.


And, of course, there is everything wrong with physically shoving aside a worker at the cemetery who was doing her job and trying to enforce the rules.


“Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign,” Arlington Cemetery officials said this week in a statement. This was made clear to Trump’s team as the visit was being planned, officials said — including the strict enforcement of the rule at Section 60, where grief and loss are still raw.


“What was abundantly clear-cut was: Section 60, no photos and no video,” a defense official told The Post.


Despite that warning, though, the Trump team brought its cameras into Section 60. When a cemetery employee tried to stop them, according to The Post, “a larger male campaign aide insisted the camera was allowed and pushed past the cemetery employee, leaving her shocked.”


No one can dismiss the incident as a misunderstanding by Trump and his aides, since their official position is that Trump is infallible. The campaign’s response, as usual, was a lie — a false and gratuitously cruel statement from spokesman Steven Cheung to NPR, which first reported the cemetery clash: “The fact is that a private photographer was permitted on the premises and for whatever reason an unnamed individual, clearly suffering from a mental health episode, decided to physically block members of President Trump’s team during a very solemn ceremony.”


The campaign promised to release footage to corroborate its version of the encounter. That turned out to be a TikTok post — a political ad — with video of Trump in Section 60. And the campaign released an image of Trump standing with family members of the fallen amid the still-fresh graves. He is shown flashing a broad smile and giving a thumbs-up.


Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), tried to chime in MAGA-style by attacking Vice President Kamala Harris — the surging Democratic Party presidential nominee — for any role she might have played in the Afghanistan withdrawal. “She wants to yell at Donald Trump because he showed up?” Vance said at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. “She can go to hell.”


For the record, at that point Harris had not yelled, or said anything at all, about the cemetery incident.


Also for the record, it was Trump who negotiated the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan and forced the Afghan government to release thousands of jailed Taliban fighters in a prisoner swap. Those decisions helped make possible the Taliban’s swift return to power.


And a point of personal privilege: The ashes of my father-in-law and mother-in-law, Edward Rhodes Collins and Annie Ruth Collins, are interred at Arlington. He was a Navy veteran who came under fire in the South Pacific during World War II and later in Korea.


Arlington National Cemetery is a place of honor. Donald Trump thinks honor is for suckers and losers — and values sacrifice only if it might help him win an election. Do not become numb to his nature.


Eugene Robinson writes a column on politics and culture and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Washington Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s Style section.


Original.


Thursday, August 29, 2024

What Is Project 2025?

We simply cannot let the Republicans take over and enact the worst pieces of Project 2025. Do whatever you can to add your voice.

This video was created by CAP, the Center for American Progress, back in July. They have a series of articles detailing how badly Project 2025 would be for America. Kinda hard to believe that they are so open about advocating for this kind of fascist authoritarianism, with Trump in charge of it, no less. 


Follow this link to the Center for American Progress' Project 2025: Exposing the Far-Right Assault on America.

Project 2025-CAP

The "CAP" in this post's Title stands for Center for American Progress. They undertook a series of articles highlighting specific aspects of this gargantuan fascist blueprint aka Project 2025. I am going to excerpt only one of the series, The Tax Plan, below, at least, for now.




August 27, 2024
Author Brendan Duke
The far-right extremist playbook would immediately raise taxes for the middle class by thousands of dollars while also pushing for long-term changes that could raise taxes by $5,900.

This article is part of a series from the Center for American Progress exposing how the sweeping Project 2025 policy agenda would harm all Americans. This new authoritarian playbook, published by the Heritage Foundation, would destroy the 250-year-old system of checks and balances upon which U.S. democracy has relied and give far-right politicians, judges, and corporations more control over Americans’ lives.

For state-specific data on how much Project 2025 would raise taxes on families, see Appendix (at link).

Large majorities of Americans worry that the tax system is unfair, with the wealthy and corporations paying less than their fair share. Yet in the extremist Mandate for Leadership, dubbed “Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project,” far-right extremist plans are outlined that raise taxes on low- and middle-income households to finance tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations. Project 2025’s tax plan includes an “intermediate tax reform” that includes changes to tax brackets and corporate tax cuts that would shift the tax burden toward middle-income households. And the “fundamental tax reform” it proposes would replace all individual income and corporate taxes with consumption taxes.

Specifically, Project 2025’s tax reform plan would:

--Enact a two-income tax bracket system that would raise taxes by $3,000 for the median family of four—which makes about $110,000 a year—and raise taxes by $950 for the typical single-person household, which makes about $40,000 a year. (see Appendix for state-specific data)
--Provide an average $1.5–2.4 million tax cut for the 45,000 U.S. households making more than $10 million annually from the combination of the “two-bracket” system and cuts to taxes on the wealthy’s investment income.
--Cut the corporate tax rate to 18 percent, which amounts to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100.
--Replace all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax in the long term. This could take the form of a value-added tax well above 45 percent, which would produce an enormous one-time burst of inflation and raise prices.

The shift toward a flat consumption tax while eliminating income taxes would lead to an average $5,900 tax increase for the middle 20 percent of households and an average $2 million tax cut for the top 0.1 percent.

Project 2025’s immediate tax reform is a $3,000 tax increase for the typical family of four


The centerpiece of Project 2025’s “intermediate tax reform” plan consolidates seven individual income tax brackets, ranging from 10 to 37 percent, to just two brackets: 15 percent and 30 percent.

Project 2025 says this is a way to “to simplify the tax code,” but the number of tax brackets is already one of the simplest parts of the tax code, especially since tax-filing software instantly calculates how much tax families owe for income in each bracket. Moreover, 70 percent of tax filers only have enough income to be in the first two brackets, so they effectively are already in a two-bracket system.


Project 2025’s new tax bracket system, however, represents an enormous shift of the tax burden from wealthy tax filers to middle-income tax filers. This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025. This effectively raises the tax rate on a married couple’s income between about $30,000 and $120,000 and on a single filer’s income between about $15,000 and $60,000. Higher-income tax filers, on the other hand, would get a tax cut, as the proposed 30 percent tax bracket is lower than the current 32 percent, 35 percent, and 37 percent brackets that much of their income falls into.*


The end result of these changes would be a tax increase for middle-class households. The median family of four made about $110,000 in 2022 and would experience about a $3,000 tax increase from this change. They would experience a tax increase in all 50 states outside of Washington, D.C., where the median family of four—making $195,000 in income—would experience a tax cut. In addition, the median one-person household made about $40,000 in 2022 and would experience a $950 tax increase under the plan. They would also experience a tax increase in all 50 states, as well as Washington, D.C. (see Appendix)


Project 2025 also “eliminates most deductions, credits and exclusions.” The calculations above do not include the effects of removing these tax provisions since it is not known which ones Project 2025 would eliminate and many middle-income households do not use many of them, such as the mortgage interest deduction, since they take the standard deduction. If Project 2025 were to eliminate the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, the tax increases on low- and middle-income families would be even larger.


Project 2025 would cut taxes for households making more than $10 million by $1.5–2.4 million


Project 2025 takes further steps to cut taxes for the wealthy. It says “capital gains and qualified dividends should be taxed at 15 percent,” which is exclusively a tax cut for the less than 2 percent of households making more than $500,000 a year, since taxpayers making below that amount already pay a 0 or 15 percent tax rate on that income. Project 2025 would also eliminate the net investment income tax, which is a 3.8 percent tax on capital gains, dividends, and other investment income received by households making more than $200,000.


Combining the changes to tax brackets, the cut in the tax rate on capital gains and dividends for the wealthy, and the elimination of the net investment income tax, this would deliver an average tax cut of up to $2.4 million for the 45,000 households making more than $10 million annually. If Project 2025 were to eliminate all itemized deductions—including the charitable deduction—and the deduction for pass-through business income for this group, their average tax cut would still be $1.5 million.


Project 2025’s immediate tax plan is a large corporate tax cut


Project 2025 does not stop at cutting taxes for wealthy individuals; it also proposes an array of tax cuts for corporations. This starts by doubling down on the staggering 14 percentage-point cut in the corporate tax rate that the majority of congressional Republicans enacted in 2017 by further cutting the rate from 21 percent to 18 percent.


This would amount to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100, the 100 largest companies in America, based on CAP analysis of their latest financial statements. This includes:


--A $1.3 billion tax cut to the five largest U.S. oil companies: Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Marathon Petroleum/ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, and Valero Energy 
--A $1.6 billion tax cut to the five largest drug makers: Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb 
--A $2.1 billion tax cut to the five largest Wall Street banks: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs
--A $800 million tax cut to the five largest grocery companies: Kroger, Costco, Albertsons, Target, and Walmart


And Project 2025 would further cut taxes for corporations by repealing the Inflation Reduction Act’s tax increases for corporations, including a 15 percent minimum corporate tax rate for the largest corporations and an excise tax on stock buyback.


There is even more of this article at the link here


And this link takes you to all of the articles in this Project 2025 series.


These guys have done some serious work here. I know that everyone is getting bombarded with solicitations for money, but consider tossing a few bucks to the Center for American Progress.



remember

remember

deja vu

deja vu

indeed

indeed

Delete Fox "News"

Delete Fox "News"

Probably

Probably