Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Sunday, November 5, 2023

Mike Johnson

Can anyone tell me how a quadrice-indicted twice-impeached popular-vote-losing adderall-huffing insurrection-leading judge-threatening lawyer-ignoring witness-tampering disabled-veteran-dishonoring inheritance-squandering language-mangling serial-sexual-predating draft-dodging casino-bankrupting butler-bullying daughter-perving hush-money-paying real-estate-scamming bone-spur-faking ketchup-hurling justice-obstructing classified-war-plan-thieving golf-cheating weather-map-defacing horse-paste-promoting paper-towel-flinging tax-evading evidence-destroying charity-defrauding money-laundering bogus-university-running diaper-filling 91-count fluorescent tangerine fuckface down in Florida is leading Biden in any polls? 


what in the actual fuck? how does Mike Johnson not have a bank account

there's a lot about Holy Mike that just doesn't add up

NOV 5, 2023

dweebish little factotum Holy Mike Johnson became House Speaker because he was standing in the right place — the corner of What About This Guy Street and Fine, Let’s Just Get It The Fuck Over With Avenue — at the right time.


nobody knew dick about the guy, except that he was some kind of god-mad religious fanatic.


but now the facts are starting to leak out and and holy shit, there’s a lot going on that makes no fucking sense at all.


first of all, how the fuck does Mike Johnson not have a bank account?


The Daily Beast reports that in financial disclosures dating back to 2016, the year he joined Congress, Johnson never reported having a savings or checking account in his name, his spouse’s name, or in the name of any of his children. In his latest filing, which covers last year, he doesn’t list a single asset either. Which, given that he made more than $200,000 last year—in addition to his wife’s salary—is more than a little odd.

 

think about that. Mike gets paid. what does he do with the check? does he go to a check-cashing place in one of DC’s skeevier neighborhoods?


seriously? a United States Representative? I don’t think so. how is Johnson paying his mortgage, in cash? please.


Holy Mike isn’t talking, so reporters are left to speculate.


Of course, it’s unlikely Johnson doesn’t actually have a bank account. What’s more likely is Johnson lives paycheck to paycheck—so much so that he doesn’t have enough money in his bank account to trigger the checking account disclosure rules for members of Congress.

House Ethics Committee filing guidelines state that members must disclose bank accounts they have at every financial institution, as long as the account holds at least $1,000 and the combined value of all accounts—including those belonging to their spouse and dependent children—exceeds $5,000.

 

except that explanation makes no sense, either.


It’s certainly not uncommon for Americans to have less than $5,000 in their bank account. Most Americans—57 percent—couldn’t handle an unexpected $1,000 expense, according to a report earlier this year. And the median amount that Americans keep in their bank account is $5,300. But Johnson’s household income puts him in the top 12 percent of earners in the United States. And it’s extraordinarily rare for members of Congress to not list a qualifying bank account—let alone zero assets whatsoever.

 

let’s do some basic math. the base salary of a US Rep is $174,000 a year, and reps get paid once a month. 


twelve times a year, Mike get a check for roughly $14,500, minus taxes — let’s say that his take-home pay is $8,000/month. again, what does he do with that check? if he puts it in the bank, his balance instantly exceeds the disclosure minimum.


so why isn’t Mike disclosing a bank account? where is the money going?


“It’s strange to see Speaker Johnson disclose no assets,” Libowitz told The Daily Beast. “He made over $200,000 last year, and his wife took home salary from two employers as well, so why isn’t there a bank account or any form of savings listed?”


what the fuck is going on here?


now let’s talk about Mike Johnson’s famous black son. here’s the story in a nutshell:


By the time he was 27 years old, Mike Johnson had not only tied the knot with his bride Kelly—a particularly tight knot called a “covenant marriage.”

He had also become a new Dad to a 14-year-old Black “son.”

How did that happen, you ask?

It was quite simple, actually.

He just “took custody."

What???

That's how they do things in Louisiana, I guess.

 

just like the bank story, holy shit, none of this makes sense.


27-year-old Mike adopted a 14-year-old boy, but he didn’t really adopt-adopt him, he “took custody.”


which, legally, is not a thing.


ok fine, let’s go with Mike’s story, he quote-unquote adopted this teenager, took him in, raised him, and … then what?


No African-American son shows up in any of the family photographs on Johnson’s House website or on his personal Facebook page. Nor does Michael figure anywhere in any of Johnson’s campaign biographies.

 

As I went further down this rabbit hole tonight I was a bit dumbfounded. Is Michael made up? Is he excluded from family pictures?

 

check out the Johnson family portrait. I don’t see a black son. do you see a black son?

just about the only time Holy Mike mentions is his “black son” is when he needs to use him as a Get Out Of Racism Free card.


A bit more poking around revealed that Michael also came up a year earlier in a House hearing on reparations in June 2019. Johnson opposed reparations and noted that his black son Michael did too.

 

so what the in the actual fuck is the real story here?


now if the Johnsons were sponsoring Michael through some kind of religious or charitable organization, that’s actually very admirable, and more power to them — but that’s in no way equivalent to an ‘adoption.’


there is not one speck of evidence that the Johnsons actually raised this now-40-year-old person.

so, again, what the fuck? 


there’s so much about Mike’s life that he doesn’t want us to know.


Then I learned that Johnson’s wife runs a Christian “counseling” service that equates homosexuality with bestiality and pedophilia, and that she has been busy scrubbing traces of this and of her podcast with her husband from the internet. And I thought, “Good luck with that.”

 

Oh wow, then there’s the fact that Johnson was named dean of a law school that never opened, whose namesake Judge Paul Pressler was (surprise, surprise) sued over sexual abuse by multiple men, and whose president was credibly accused of misappropriating funds. Huh.

 

sorry Mike, but all this was going to come out sooner than later.


are you really sure that putting yourself under the harsh glare of the House Speakership was the right move for a guy as sketchy as you seem to be?



but that’s how it always goes with these flim flam fucksticks, they never quit while they’re ahead.


look at George Santos. he could have continued to fleece old ladies and swindle homeless veterans from here to breakfast. he could have kept changing his name and moving from state to state and country to country and chances were good that the authorities would have never caught up with him. but he had to run for one of the most highly-visible jobs in the world — US Representative — and now he’s facing 23 criminal counts and looking at serious prison time.


and what about that quadrice-indicted twice-impeached popular-vote-losing adderall-huffing insurrection-leading judge-threatening lawyer-ignoring witness-tampering disabled-veteran-dishonoring inheritance-squandering language-mangling serial-sexual-predating draft-dodging casino-bankrupting butler-bullying daughter-perving hush-money-paying real-estate-scamming bone-spur-faking ketchup-hurling justice-obstructing classified-war-plan-thieving golf-cheating weather-map-defacing horse-paste-promoting paper-towel-flinging tax-evading evidence-destroying charity-defrauding money-laundering bogus-university-running diaper-filling 91-count fluorescent tangerine fuckface down in Florida — if he’d only been content to keep on laundering Russian mob money and keep bribing the right prosecutors, right now he’d be happily cheating at golf without a care in the world.


but Little Donny Fuckface had to put himself under the world’s largest spotlight by running for president — all while continuing to crime up a storm — now, like Santos, he’s facing umpteen criminal counts and the real possibility of prison.


as a result, he’s spending his Sunday shitting his diaper in a panic over what the daughter he wants to quote-unquote “date” is going to be saying about him this week at the Big Trump Family Fraud Fuckery Trial.


original.


Monday, October 30, 2023

Firearm deaths

Some interesting info from UC-Davis on firearm deaths in the United States. 


The human toll

There were 39,707 deaths from firearms in the U.S. in 2019. Sixty percent of deaths from firearms in the U.S. are suicides. In 2019, 23,941 people in the U.S. died by firearm suicide.1 Firearms are the means in approximately half of suicides nationwide.

In 2019, 14,861 people in the U.S. died from firearm homicide, accounting for 37% of total deaths from firearms. Firearms were the means for about 75% of homicides in 2018.

The other 3% of firearm deaths are unintentional, undetermined, from legal intervention, or from public mass shootings (0.2% of total firearm deaths).

There are approximately 115,000 non-fatal firearm injuries in the U.S. each year.

The economic cost

The estimated annual cost of gun injury in 2012 exceeded $229 billion—about 1.4% of GDP.2

Prevalence of ownership

31% of all households in the U.S. have firearms, and 22% of American adults personally own one or more firearms.3

Compared with other countries

The U.S. has relatively low rates of assaultive violence but high firearm mortality rates in comparison with other industrialized nations.4

Risk and safety

Research has found that individuals with risk factors for firearm injury and death are less likely to safely store their firearms when compared to firearm owners without these risk factors.5,6

Trends in firearm injury and death

Overall since 2006, firearm homicides in the U.S. have decreased, but the number of firearm suicides has increased by a similar amount.4

Even when firearm homicide rates were at their highest in the mid-1990s (just above 7/100,000 population), they were not higher than those for firearm suicide.

Firearm homicide and suicide rates vary demographically and geographically.

Learn more about trends in firearm injury and death in the U.S.

The role of health care providers

There are no state or federal statutes that prohibit health care providers from asking about patients’ access to firearms when the information is relevant to the health of the patient or the health of someone else.7,8

Research has shown that patients are generally receptive to provider questions on firearm access and safety.9,10

  1. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2018.
  2. Follman M, Lurie J, Lee J, West J. The true cost of gun violence in America. 2015. (Accessed 10 December, 2017, at https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2015/04/true-cost-of-gun-violence-in-america/)
  3. Smith TW, Son J. General Social Survey final report: trends in gun ownership in the United States, 1972-2014. 2015.
  4. Wintemute GJ. The epidemiology of firearm violence in the twenty-first century United States. Annu Rev Public Health 2015;36:5-19.
  5. Nelson DE, Grant-Worley JA, Powell K, Mercy J, Holtzman D. Population estimates of household firearm storage practices and firearm carrying in Oregon. JAMA 1996;275:1744-8.
  6. Nordstrom DL, Zwerling C, Stromquist AM, Burmeister LF, Merchant JA. Rural population survey of behavioral and demographic risk factors for loaded firearms. Inj Prev 2001;7:112-6.
  7. Wintemute GJ, Betz ME, Ranney ML. Yes, you can: physicians, patients, and firearms. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:205-13.
  8. Kapp MB. Geriatric patients, firearms, and physicians. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:421-2.
  9. Betz ME, Flaten HK, Miller M. Older adult openness to physician questioning about firearms. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:2214-5.
  10. Walters H, Kulkarni M, Forman J, Roeder K, Travis J, Valenstein M. Feasibility and acceptability of interventions to delay gun access in VA mental health settings. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2012;34:692-8.



Saturday, October 28, 2023

Good News?

Sometimes it's hard to find good news. Sometimes all you have to do is tune in to Simon Rosenberg and his Hopium Chronicles.



Lots of Good News Of Late - A reminder of what we’ve learned in the last few weeks: 


Winning Virginia - While the early vote in Virginia is getting more Democratic every day, we are still not where we want to be and need to keep pushing. Hope will you donate to or volunteer for one of the six swing, too-close-to-call races we’ve gotten behind here, or keep working with whatever program you are working with already. We need to have a big weekend this weekend to have the election we all want to have in November. I will be canvassing on Saturday - weather is looking good! Thanks to all of you who have donated, volunteered - been so inspiring to see all the ways people are helping out in Virginia! We are now over $100,000 raised for our six candidates! 

If you want to do a live check-in on Virginia today, Tom Bonier and I will be joining our friends at Network NOVA for their weekly Power Lunch at Noon EST.  RSVP here!

John Kirby On Israel-Gaza - For all of us trying to make sense of this terrible moment in the Middle East, I pass along an instructive video and partial transcript of White House National Security Spokesperson John Kirby’s answer to a question yesterday from a Brazilian reporter from the briefing room: 

TV Globo’s @RKrahenbuhl: “So, besides saying that he doesn't have confidence in these numbers, the President went further to say that innocents will die and that this is the price of the war. You also said that.” Kirby: “I have indeed.” Krähenbühl: “Don't you think this is insensitive? There’s being very harsh criticism in about it. For example, the Council of American-Islamic Relations said it was deeply disturbed and call on the President to apologize. Would the President apologize?” 

Kirby: “No.”

Krähenbühl: “And does he regret saying something like that?” 

Kirby: “What’s harsh — what’s harsh is the way Hamas is using people as human shields. What’s harsh is taking a couple of hundred hostages and leaving families and anxious, waiting and worrying to figure out where their loved ones are. What's harsh, is dropping in on a music festival and slaughtering a bunch of young people just trying to enjoy an afternoon. I could go on and on. That's what's harsh. That is what's harsh and being honest about the fact that there have been civilian casualties and that there likely will be more is being honest, because that's what war is. It's brutal. It's ugly. It's messy. I've said that before. President also said that yesterday. Doesn't mean we have to like it. And it doesn't mean that we're dismissing anyone of those casualties each and every one is a tragedy in its own right...It would be helpful if Hamas would let [Gazans] leave....We know that there are thousands waiting to leave Gaza writ large and Hamas is preventing them from doing it. That is what is harsh.”


The New Speaker - So yesterday I shared an op-ed our new Speaker published some years back decrying the Supreme Court’s decision to outlaw anti-sodomy laws in the United States. So it was a bit surprising to hear the new Speaker claim in an interview he recorded yesterday (clip below, with Hannity of course) that as a “rule of law” conservative he abides by the Court’s decisions once they are made. Not what he did in that op-ed yesterday, of course, and not what he did in his decades long challenge of Roe. It’s perhaps a small lie but to me a significant one for he is so clearly and shockingly full of shit here that we should anticipate many more lies, about things that really matter, in the days ahead. Watch the video for it also contains this all time classic: 

“Someone asked me today in the media, ‘People are curious, what does Mike Johnson think about any issue?’ I said, ‘Well, go pick up a Bible off your shelf and read it. That’s my worldview.”

Unprecedented GOP Betrayal Continues - So in a time of dramatic and escalating tension around the world, the Republicans continue to:

Keep working hard all. We have a lot of work to do - Simon

Original


Saturday, October 14, 2023

WaPo Ed Board

To paraphrase the last couple of sentences, we are very lucky to NOT have Trump in the White House any longer, and SO lucky to have Joe Biden in there. Trump should ideally be locked up somewhere and unable to utter his lies, absurdities and threats. The U.S., and the world, would be a lot better off.


Biden rises to the occasion on Israel and Hamas. Trump sinks to a new low.

Washington Post Editorial Board
October 12, 2023

At a time when the United States, and the world, desperately need decency and moral clarity, President Biden has provided both. His words regarding the wanton atrocities Hamas has committed against hundreds of Israeli civilians, as well as many Americans and citizens of other countries, in the past week have been unequivocal. In remarks to a gathering of American Jewish leaders Wednesday, he described the mass murder as “sheer evil” and likened it to “the worst atrocities of ISIS.”


In condemning the terrorism, and offering support to Israel’s military response, the president also reminded the new emergency war government under Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of its responsibilities under “the law of war.” These measured statements put the United States in just the right place: supportive of Israel but positioned, if need be, to influence and temper its response.


In short, Mr. Biden has so far met the elementary test of political leadership amid crisis, as those who placed their trust in him at the ballot box three years ago hoped he could. By no means do we intend to endorse all the steps and missteps he and his administration might have taken in the Middle East up to this point. The important thing is how the United States, in concert with allies, deals with the reality that began Saturday.


Nor do we propose to adjudicate all the inevitable controversies that have arisen over who in Hollywood or on college campuses or on the streets of Manhattan said what about Hamas’s massacre. Inevitably — and regrettably — amid many sober and sincere expressions, there were too many instances of justification or outright celebration.


What matters most is what those who exercise, or would exercise, political power say and do. It matters that they show the ability to differentiate — to treat the slaughter of these particular innocents on its own terms, without relativization, even as everyone knows and understands that it occurred within a broader context that includes Palestinian suffering, historical and contemporary. Unreserved condemnation of Hamas’s terrorism is the price of admission to this debate — or, rather, to the morally serious part of it. In that respect, Mr. Biden’s firm words also stand in welcome contrast to the equivocations by a small number of the left-wing members of Congress in his own party, which White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre specifically repudiated.


In a reckless category of their own, however, were the comments of GOP presidential front-runner Donald Trump. To be sure, he labeled the Hamas attack a “disgrace” shortly after it occurred — then pivoted to blaming it on Mr. Biden’s policies. That was about par for the partisan course, alas. Yet the former president went in a bizarre new direction Wednesday by heaping scorn on Israel itself for failing to anticipate the attack and lecturing the Jewish state to “step up their game.”


He labeled the Iran-backed Hezbollah militant group “very smart,” comparing it to an authoritarian he rates highly for ruling “1.4 billion people ... with an iron fist”: Chinese President Xi Jinping. And he referred to Israel’s defense minister as a “jerk” for purportedly revealing weaknesses in the country’s northern defenses. To top it off, the former president said Mr. Netanyahu had “let us down” by refusing to aid the deadly strike Mr. Trump ordered against the commander of Iran’s elite Quds Force on Jan. 3, 2020.


An Israeli spokesman denied the account and dismissed Mr. Trump’s comments as “shameful.” There’s a lesson here for Mr. Netanyahu, who forged a close relationship with Mr. Trump during his presidency, based on the latter’s generally uncritical support for Mr. Netanyahu. There’s a lesson, too, for the Israeli public, among whom Mr. Trump was popular while in office.


Mostly, though, it is Americans who need to take notice of these comments — especially Republicans, both voters and politicians. To their credit, some of Mr. Trump’s rivals for the GOP nomination denounced his remarks. Even by his standards, they showed an extraordinary penchant for rubbing salt in the wounds of an ostensible friend and for converting an international crisis into a drama about himself. Mr. Trump’s latest outburst showed how fortunate this country is that he is not in the White House now and how unfortunate it would be if he ever returned to it.


The difficult days ahead will require rhetorical precision, empathy for victims and strategic thinking about U.S. interests. Real leaders rise to the occasion.


Original.


remember

remember

deja vu

deja vu

indeed

indeed

Probably

Probably

Delete Fox "News"

Delete Fox "News"

Smells really bad

Smells really bad

Applies to Trump

Applies to Trump

Trump is the enemy

Trump is the enemy

2024 Election

2024 Election

$132 billion

$132 billion

Remember

Remember

too true

too true

Didn't realize the GOP hated America so much.

Didn't realize the GOP hated America so much.