Never pass up a chance to sit down or relieve yourself. -old Apache saying

Friday, August 30, 2024

Eugene Robinson

Eugene Robinson is an opinion columnist for the Washington Post. This column focuses on Trump's visit to Arlington National Cemetery. 

As if we needed any further evidence that Trump does not give a shit for decorum, decency, and rules, they bullied their way into Section 60, one of the most restricted areas at Arlington and took lots of pictures and videos, which are against the rules. They are already using the pics and videos for his campaign, which is strictly prohibited. 

Trump don't care. Tell me, what kind of person stands by tombstones, smiles and gives a thumbs-up for the camera? Are you GLAD these people are dead?! This controversy is not dying away quickly, like a lot of Trump's bullshit. Hopefully his rude actions will alienate even more military personnel from voting for him come November. If you vote for this orange circus clown, you share in the responsibility.

Don’t yawn at Trump’s dishonorable use of Arlington National Cemetery

The candidate who has repeatedly maligned our soldiers couldn’t resist an illegal publicity stunt.

Donald Trump has shown the nation, once again, that he has no shame.

You knew that, of course. But hauling a camera crew to Arlington National Cemetery and exploiting the fresh graves of heroes — using them as props in his presidential campaign — was more than a violation of the cemetery’s rules; it was more, even, than a violation of federal law. It was a deeply dishonorable act by a shockingly dishonorable man.


Just because we are accustomed to this kind of behavior from Trump does not mean we should accept it. Just because he has no sense of honor or appreciation of sacrifice does not mean we have to pretend honor and sacrifice no longer exist. Just because “Trump is an awful person” is an old story does not mean we should yawn at this latest demonstration and quickly move on.  Section 60 at Arlington Cemetery is the resting place of the men and women who most recently gave what Abraham Lincoln called “the last full measure of devotion” to their country. Monday was the third anniversary of the suicide bombing that killed 13 U.S. troops during the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan. There is nothing wrong with a former president visiting those graves to commemorate that terrible day.


There is everything wrong, though, with that former president using the occasion to generate visual fodder for his bid to return to the White House. Trump brought along a photographer and videographer from his campaign to capture images of the visit — which his campaign team knew, and he surely knew, was forbidden.


And, of course, there is everything wrong with physically shoving aside a worker at the cemetery who was doing her job and trying to enforce the rules.


“Federal law prohibits political campaign or election-related activities within Army National Military Cemeteries, to include photographers, content creators or any other persons attending for purposes, or in direct support of a partisan political candidate’s campaign,” Arlington Cemetery officials said this week in a statement. This was made clear to Trump’s team as the visit was being planned, officials said — including the strict enforcement of the rule at Section 60, where grief and loss are still raw.


“What was abundantly clear-cut was: Section 60, no photos and no video,” a defense official told The Post.


Despite that warning, though, the Trump team brought its cameras into Section 60. When a cemetery employee tried to stop them, according to The Post, “a larger male campaign aide insisted the camera was allowed and pushed past the cemetery employee, leaving her shocked.”


No one can dismiss the incident as a misunderstanding by Trump and his aides, since their official position is that Trump is infallible. The campaign’s response, as usual, was a lie — a false and gratuitously cruel statement from spokesman Steven Cheung to NPR, which first reported the cemetery clash: “The fact is that a private photographer was permitted on the premises and for whatever reason an unnamed individual, clearly suffering from a mental health episode, decided to physically block members of President Trump’s team during a very solemn ceremony.”


The campaign promised to release footage to corroborate its version of the encounter. That turned out to be a TikTok post — a political ad — with video of Trump in Section 60. And the campaign released an image of Trump standing with family members of the fallen amid the still-fresh graves. He is shown flashing a broad smile and giving a thumbs-up.


Trump’s running mate, Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), tried to chime in MAGA-style by attacking Vice President Kamala Harris — the surging Democratic Party presidential nominee — for any role she might have played in the Afghanistan withdrawal. “She wants to yell at Donald Trump because he showed up?” Vance said at a campaign event in Pennsylvania. “She can go to hell.”


For the record, at that point Harris had not yelled, or said anything at all, about the cemetery incident.


Also for the record, it was Trump who negotiated the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan and forced the Afghan government to release thousands of jailed Taliban fighters in a prisoner swap. Those decisions helped make possible the Taliban’s swift return to power.


And a point of personal privilege: The ashes of my father-in-law and mother-in-law, Edward Rhodes Collins and Annie Ruth Collins, are interred at Arlington. He was a Navy veteran who came under fire in the South Pacific during World War II and later in Korea.


Arlington National Cemetery is a place of honor. Donald Trump thinks honor is for suckers and losers — and values sacrifice only if it might help him win an election. Do not become numb to his nature.


Eugene Robinson writes a column on politics and culture and hosts a weekly online chat with readers. In a three-decade career at The Washington Post, Robinson has been city hall reporter, city editor, foreign correspondent in Buenos Aires and London, foreign editor, and assistant managing editor in charge of the paper’s Style section.


Original.


Thursday, August 29, 2024

What Is Project 2025?

We simply cannot let the Republicans take over and enact the worst pieces of Project 2025. Do whatever you can to add your voice.

This video was created by CAP, the Center for American Progress, back in July. They have a series of articles detailing how badly Project 2025 would be for America. Kinda hard to believe that they are so open about advocating for this kind of fascist authoritarianism, with Trump in charge of it, no less. 


Follow this link to the Center for American Progress' Project 2025: Exposing the Far-Right Assault on America.

Project 2025-CAP

The "CAP" in this post's Title stands for Center for American Progress. They undertook a series of articles highlighting specific aspects of this gargantuan fascist blueprint aka Project 2025. I am going to excerpt only one of the series, The Tax Plan, below, at least, for now.




August 27, 2024
Author Brendan Duke
The far-right extremist playbook would immediately raise taxes for the middle class by thousands of dollars while also pushing for long-term changes that could raise taxes by $5,900.

This article is part of a series from the Center for American Progress exposing how the sweeping Project 2025 policy agenda would harm all Americans. This new authoritarian playbook, published by the Heritage Foundation, would destroy the 250-year-old system of checks and balances upon which U.S. democracy has relied and give far-right politicians, judges, and corporations more control over Americans’ lives.

For state-specific data on how much Project 2025 would raise taxes on families, see Appendix (at link).

Large majorities of Americans worry that the tax system is unfair, with the wealthy and corporations paying less than their fair share. Yet in the extremist Mandate for Leadership, dubbed “Project 2025: Presidential Transition Project,” far-right extremist plans are outlined that raise taxes on low- and middle-income households to finance tax cuts for the wealthy and large corporations. Project 2025’s tax plan includes an “intermediate tax reform” that includes changes to tax brackets and corporate tax cuts that would shift the tax burden toward middle-income households. And the “fundamental tax reform” it proposes would replace all individual income and corporate taxes with consumption taxes.

Specifically, Project 2025’s tax reform plan would:

--Enact a two-income tax bracket system that would raise taxes by $3,000 for the median family of four—which makes about $110,000 a year—and raise taxes by $950 for the typical single-person household, which makes about $40,000 a year. (see Appendix for state-specific data)
--Provide an average $1.5–2.4 million tax cut for the 45,000 U.S. households making more than $10 million annually from the combination of the “two-bracket” system and cuts to taxes on the wealthy’s investment income.
--Cut the corporate tax rate to 18 percent, which amounts to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100.
--Replace all individual and corporate income taxes with a consumption tax in the long term. This could take the form of a value-added tax well above 45 percent, which would produce an enormous one-time burst of inflation and raise prices.

The shift toward a flat consumption tax while eliminating income taxes would lead to an average $5,900 tax increase for the middle 20 percent of households and an average $2 million tax cut for the top 0.1 percent.

Project 2025’s immediate tax reform is a $3,000 tax increase for the typical family of four


The centerpiece of Project 2025’s “intermediate tax reform” plan consolidates seven individual income tax brackets, ranging from 10 to 37 percent, to just two brackets: 15 percent and 30 percent.

Project 2025 says this is a way to “to simplify the tax code,” but the number of tax brackets is already one of the simplest parts of the tax code, especially since tax-filing software instantly calculates how much tax families owe for income in each bracket. Moreover, 70 percent of tax filers only have enough income to be in the first two brackets, so they effectively are already in a two-bracket system.


Project 2025’s new tax bracket system, however, represents an enormous shift of the tax burden from wealthy tax filers to middle-income tax filers. This is because the two current bottom brackets (10 percent and 12 percent) are lower than the 15 percent tax bracket proposed by Project 2025. This effectively raises the tax rate on a married couple’s income between about $30,000 and $120,000 and on a single filer’s income between about $15,000 and $60,000. Higher-income tax filers, on the other hand, would get a tax cut, as the proposed 30 percent tax bracket is lower than the current 32 percent, 35 percent, and 37 percent brackets that much of their income falls into.*


The end result of these changes would be a tax increase for middle-class households. The median family of four made about $110,000 in 2022 and would experience about a $3,000 tax increase from this change. They would experience a tax increase in all 50 states outside of Washington, D.C., where the median family of four—making $195,000 in income—would experience a tax cut. In addition, the median one-person household made about $40,000 in 2022 and would experience a $950 tax increase under the plan. They would also experience a tax increase in all 50 states, as well as Washington, D.C. (see Appendix)


Project 2025 also “eliminates most deductions, credits and exclusions.” The calculations above do not include the effects of removing these tax provisions since it is not known which ones Project 2025 would eliminate and many middle-income households do not use many of them, such as the mortgage interest deduction, since they take the standard deduction. If Project 2025 were to eliminate the child tax credit and earned income tax credit, the tax increases on low- and middle-income families would be even larger.


Project 2025 would cut taxes for households making more than $10 million by $1.5–2.4 million


Project 2025 takes further steps to cut taxes for the wealthy. It says “capital gains and qualified dividends should be taxed at 15 percent,” which is exclusively a tax cut for the less than 2 percent of households making more than $500,000 a year, since taxpayers making below that amount already pay a 0 or 15 percent tax rate on that income. Project 2025 would also eliminate the net investment income tax, which is a 3.8 percent tax on capital gains, dividends, and other investment income received by households making more than $200,000.


Combining the changes to tax brackets, the cut in the tax rate on capital gains and dividends for the wealthy, and the elimination of the net investment income tax, this would deliver an average tax cut of up to $2.4 million for the 45,000 households making more than $10 million annually. If Project 2025 were to eliminate all itemized deductions—including the charitable deduction—and the deduction for pass-through business income for this group, their average tax cut would still be $1.5 million.


Project 2025’s immediate tax plan is a large corporate tax cut


Project 2025 does not stop at cutting taxes for wealthy individuals; it also proposes an array of tax cuts for corporations. This starts by doubling down on the staggering 14 percentage-point cut in the corporate tax rate that the majority of congressional Republicans enacted in 2017 by further cutting the rate from 21 percent to 18 percent.


This would amount to a $24 billion tax cut for the Fortune 100, the 100 largest companies in America, based on CAP analysis of their latest financial statements. This includes:


--A $1.3 billion tax cut to the five largest U.S. oil companies: Exxon Mobil, Chevron, Marathon Petroleum/ConocoPhillips, Phillips 66, and Valero Energy 
--A $1.6 billion tax cut to the five largest drug makers: Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Bristol Myers Squibb 
--A $2.1 billion tax cut to the five largest Wall Street banks: JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and Goldman Sachs
--A $800 million tax cut to the five largest grocery companies: Kroger, Costco, Albertsons, Target, and Walmart


And Project 2025 would further cut taxes for corporations by repealing the Inflation Reduction Act’s tax increases for corporations, including a 15 percent minimum corporate tax rate for the largest corporations and an excise tax on stock buyback.


There is even more of this article at the link here


And this link takes you to all of the articles in this Project 2025 series.


These guys have done some serious work here. I know that everyone is getting bombarded with solicitations for money, but consider tossing a few bucks to the Center for American Progress.



Wednesday, August 28, 2024

Democracy Forward

Here is another analysis of Project 2025. This one a project by Democracy Forward: The People's Guide to Project 2025. This one has more references to actual page numbers inside the "Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise." Funny name, as they do NOT have a mandate for this, it is far from "leadership," and it's not really "conservative." It's fascism and regression. Finally, a "Promise?" 


The People’s Guide to Project 2025

What is Project 2025?

The Project 2025 Presidential Transition Project is a well-funded (eight-figure) effort of the Heritage Foundation and more than 100 organizations to enable a future anti-democratic presidential administration to take swift, far-right action that would cut wages for working people, dismantle social safety net programs, reverse decades of progress for civil rights, redefine the way our society operates, and undermine our economy.

A central pillar of Project 2025 is the “Mandate for Leadership,” a 900+ page policy playbook authored by former Trump administration officials and other extremists that provides a radical vision for our nation and a roadmap to implement it.

We read Project 2025’s entire 900+ page “Mandate for Leadership” so that you don’t have to.

What we discovered was a systemic, ruthless plan to undermine the quality of life of millions of Americans, remove critical protections and dismantle programs for communities across the nation, and prioritize special interests and ideological extremism over people.

From attacking overtime pay, student loans, and reproductive rights, to allowing more discrimination, pollution, and price gouging, those behind Project 2025 are preparing to go to incredible lengths to create a country only for some, not for all of us.

If these plans are enacted, even without congressional approval, 4.3 million people could lose overtime protections, 40 million people could have their food assistance reduced, 220,000 American jobs could be lost, and much, much, more. The stakes are higher than ever for democracy and for people.

These threats aren’t hypothetical. These are their real plans.

The Heritage Foundation and the 100+ organizations that make up the Project
2025 Advisory Board have mapped out exactly how they will achieve their extreme ends. They aim to carry out many of the most troubling proposals through an anti-democratic president and political loyalists installed in the executive branch, without waiting for congressional action. And, while many of these plans are unlawful, winning in court is not guaranteed given that the same far-right movement that is behind Project 2025 has shaped our current court system.

To combat the threats posed by Project 2025, we have to first understand them.

What follows are some of the most dangerous proposals that make up Project 2025, specifically those that could be implemented through federal agencies and a far- right executive branch.

The majority of Americans share the same values and priorities, but Project 2025 wants to push an extreme, out-of-touch agenda on all of us. By reading this guide and sharing it, we can begin to address these threats and go on offense towards building a bold, inclusive democracy for all people.

The People's Guide to Project 2025.


Tuesday, August 27, 2024

State Line

If Trump "wins" the election in November, then he will try to push Project 2025 to be enacted, and the scenario depicted in the video below will very likely come to pass. Of course, for it to be fully implemented, the GOP must win the presidency, Senate and retain the House. That is very unlikely, judging by the race today. 

In my opinion, the only way Trump can "win" will be by stealing it, and that includes voter suppression and intimidation and the compliance of state officials to make him the winner. And yes, the GOP has also "captured" the SCOTUS, but none of the darkest visions need come to pass, if the American people get in the way.


Daily Kos

I'm going to run a series of Project 2025 posts. Some will be highly detailed. Some will present a skim. Many will say similar things, but repetition is key, my lovelies. It helps me to repeat some things until they become "incorporated" in my aging brain. 

Here's one from Daily Kos about how Trump is trying to run away from Project 2025 without much luck. The Harris/Walz team needs to pin Project 2025 to his evil orange face. Trump's denials of any knowledge of Project 2025 should be treated like most everything else that comes out of his mouth: A LIE!


 at 6:30:02p CDT

Democrats were laser-focused on Project 2025 during this week’s Democratic National Convention, devoting segments each night to describing the different policy disasters that are part of the extremist blueprint for a second Donald Trump administration. 

And being tied to Project 2025 continues to freak the hell out of Trump. On Thursday, he even went to his favorite cable news refuge, “Fox & Friends,” to claim ignorance yet again.

“I have no idea what Project 25 is, but they use it, and they know it.” Trump said. While hate-watching Vice President Kamala Harris’ acceptance speech Thursday night, he posted about the right-wing scheme again on Truth Social.

Trump tweet on project 2025

The most hilarious evidence of his panic has to be this GOP mailer that hit mailboxes in Michigan this week.

The denial is in bright blue and red letters: “Straight from Trump’s Platform,” it says. “NOT PROJECT 2025, WHICH TRUMP DIDN’T WRITE AND DOES NOT SUPPORT.”

Oh, Donald—still fighting these inconvenient truths about The Heritage Foundation’s scheme. Like the fact that the project’s chief architect admitted on hidden camera that Trump has given them his blessing.

Follow this link to see video referenced above.

Or the story this week from CBS News, headlined “Hundreds of proposals in Project 2025 match Trump's policies.” CBS “identified at least 270 proposals in Project 2025's published blueprint for the next Republican president that match Trump's past policies and current campaign promises.” Those include: bringing back at least 80 of Trump’s executive orders from his tenure; 170 Project 2025 proposals that are on Trump’s website or that he talks about in speeches; and another 21 that “match both Trump's past actions and his campaign promises and statements.”

That builds on this July story from CNN, titled “Trump claims not to know who is behind Project 2025. A CNN review found that at least 140 people who worked for him are involved.” For starters, CNN found that six former Cabinet secretaries, four Trump ambassador nominees, his first deputy chief of staff, and “several enforcers of his controversial immigration crackdown” had helped craft Project 2025. 

This is a serious case of the gentleman protesting too much. And it’s hilariously ironic that the more he insists it has nothing to do with him, the deeper journalists dig—the Streisand Effect in action. Trump isn’t credible on just about anything, but on this one, he’s lost the battle. Fox News might indulge his repeated disavowals, but it won’t work: Trump and Project 2025 have become inextricably linked.

Trump’s campaign keeps yammering on about how Harris has no policies—as if they want this to be an election about policy. But now that Project 2025’s proposed policies are on everyone’s lips, they’re panicked by that. Trump’s cronies at The Heritage Foundation put it all out there on paper, and everybody hates it. Even worse for Republicans, people are now likely to cast their votes with Project 2025 in mind.

That makes the Democrats’ strategy of putting the focus on it very smart. This is Trump’s vision for another term in the White House, and the people who wrote it are the people who would enforce it if given the chance. 

Like vice presidential nominee Tim Walz, Minnesota governor and former high school football coach, said: “When somebody takes the time to draw up a playbook, trust me, they're gonna use it.” 

We need your help if we’re going to defeat Trump, Vance, Project 2025, and Republicans up and down the ballot. Click here to volunteer to write letters so we can increase voter turnout.

Original.


He's always watching

He's always watching